Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Validation rotated vma bounds are within the object
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 16:52:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200109145241.GO1208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200109141152.975687-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 02:11:52PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quite understandably, we bug out when asked to find a page that doesn't
> belong to the object. However, we should report the error back to the
> user long before we attempt the out-of-bound access! In this case, it is
> insufficient validation on the rotated vma, with the simplest/cheapest
> point for us to insert a bound check when we are computing the rotated
> page lookups.
> 
> Similarly, it might be wise to see if we can validate the user input
> upon creating the rotated framebuffer.

We do. Did someone break it?

> 
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/951
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> index 99189cdba8a9..59a60968a6da 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> @@ -1283,6 +1283,7 @@ static noinline struct sg_table *
>  intel_rotate_pages(struct intel_rotation_info *rot_info,
>  		   struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>  {
> +	const unsigned long npages = obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  	unsigned int size = intel_rotation_info_size(rot_info);
>  	struct sg_table *st;
>  	struct scatterlist *sg;
> @@ -1302,9 +1303,23 @@ intel_rotate_pages(struct intel_rotation_info *rot_info,
>  	sg = st->sgl;
>  
>  	for (i = 0 ; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rot_info->plane); i++) {
> -		sg = rotate_pages(obj, rot_info->plane[i].offset,
> -				  rot_info->plane[i].width, rot_info->plane[i].height,
> -				  rot_info->plane[i].stride, st, sg);
> +		const struct intel_remapped_plane_info *plane =
> +			&rot_info->plane[i];
> +		unsigned long last;
> +
> +		last = plane->offset;
> +		last += (plane->height - 1) * plane->stride;
> +		last += plane->width - 1;
> +		if (last >= npages) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err_sg_alloc;
> +		}
> +
> +		sg = rotate_pages(obj,
> +				  plane->offset,
> +				  plane->width, plane->height,
> +				  plane->stride,
> +				  st, sg);
>  	}
>  
>  	return st;
> -- 
> 2.25.0.rc2

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-09 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-09 14:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Validation rotated vma bounds are within the object Chris Wilson
2020-01-09 14:52 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-01-09 18:37   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-09 19:01     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-09 23:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2020-01-09 23:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-01-10 15:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/gt: Validate " Chris Wilson
2020-01-10 15:57   ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-10 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gt: Validation rotated vma bounds are within the object (rev2) Patchwork
2020-01-10 20:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-01-14 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200109145241.GO1208@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox