Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: split intel_modeset_driver_remove() to pre/post irq uninstall
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 16:46:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200204144658.GS13686@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99ec54fedc29b2cc24b1976fb99d6a696bfb58e3.1580823606.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 03:42:22PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Split intel_modeset_driver_remove() to two, the part with working irqs
> before irq uninstall, and the part after irq uninstall. Move
> irq_unintall() closer to the layer it belongs.
> 
> The error path in i915_driver_modeset_probe() looks obviously weird
> after this, but remains as good or broken as it ever was. No functional
> changes.
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 12 +++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c              |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index b0af37fb6d4a..69d6fe626a19 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -18826,6 +18826,7 @@ static void intel_hpd_poll_fini(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  	drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);
>  }
>  
> +/* part #1: call before irq uninstall */
>  void intel_modeset_driver_remove(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  {
>  	flush_workqueue(i915->flip_wq);
> @@ -18833,14 +18834,11 @@ void intel_modeset_driver_remove(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  
>  	flush_work(&i915->atomic_helper.free_work);
>  	WARN_ON(!llist_empty(&i915->atomic_helper.free_list));
> +}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Interrupts and polling as the first thing to avoid creating havoc.
> -	 * Too much stuff here (turning of connectors, ...) would
> -	 * experience fancy races otherwise.
> -	 */

Maybe the comment should stay at the start of the _noirq() function?
Or maybe it's obvious now. Shrug.

> -	intel_irq_uninstall(i915);
> -
> +/* part #2: call after irq uninstall */
> +void intel_modeset_driver_remove_noirq(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
>  	/*
>  	 * Due to the hpd irq storm handling the hotplug work can re-arm the
>  	 * poll handlers. Hence disable polling after hpd handling is shut down.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> index 75438a136d58..f92efbbec838 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> @@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ intel_format_info_is_yuv_semiplanar(const struct drm_format_info *info,
>  void intel_modeset_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>  int intel_modeset_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>  void intel_modeset_driver_remove(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +void intel_modeset_driver_remove_noirq(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>  void intel_display_resume(struct drm_device *dev);
>  void intel_init_pch_refclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 6ab2de82b5f7..5330a0f10e97 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -332,6 +332,9 @@ static int i915_driver_modeset_probe(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  	i915_gem_driver_release(i915);
>  cleanup_modeset:
>  	intel_modeset_driver_remove(i915);
> +	intel_irq_uninstall(i915);
> +	intel_modeset_driver_remove_noirq(i915);
> +	goto cleanup_csr;
>  cleanup_irq:
>  	intel_irq_uninstall(i915);
>  cleanup_csr:
> @@ -348,6 +351,8 @@ static void i915_driver_modeset_remove(struct drm_i915_private *i915)

A bit funny with the naming of driver_modeset_remove() vs.
modeset_driver_remove(). But that's already in there.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

>  
>  	intel_irq_uninstall(i915);
>  
> +	intel_modeset_driver_remove_noirq(i915);
> +
>  	intel_bios_driver_remove(i915);
>  
>  	intel_vga_unregister(i915);
> -- 
> 2.20.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-04 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-04 13:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] drm/i915: modeset probe/remove cleanup, again Jani Nikula
2020-02-04 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: register vga switcheroo later, unregister earlier Jani Nikula
2020-02-04 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: switch i915_driver_probe() to use i915 local variable Jani Nikula
2020-02-04 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: split intel_modeset_driver_remove() to pre/post irq uninstall Jani Nikula
2020-02-04 14:46   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-02-04 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: split i915_driver_modeset_remove() " Jani Nikula
2020-02-04 14:49   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-04 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: split i915_driver_modeset_probe() to pre/post irq install Jani Nikula
2020-02-04 14:53   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-04 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: split intel_modeset_init() " Jani Nikula
2020-02-04 14:59   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-04 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: split intel_modeset_init() pre/post gem init Jani Nikula
2020-02-04 15:05   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-04 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: move more display related probe/remove stuff to display Jani Nikula
2020-02-04 15:11   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-04 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: remove the now redundant i915_driver_modeset_* call layer Jani Nikula
2020-02-04 15:16   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-05  1:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: modeset probe/remove cleanup, again Patchwork
2020-02-05  2:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200204144658.GS13686@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox