From: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>
To: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/lvds: convert to drm_device based logging macros.
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:11:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200226101138.15435-10-wambui.karugax@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200226101138.15435-1-wambui.karugax@gmail.com>
Converts various instances of the printk based drm logging macros to the
struct drm_device based logging macros in i915/display/intel_lvds.c.
This transformation was done by the following coccinelle script that
matches based on the existence of a drm_i915_private device:
@@
identifier fn, T;
@@
fn(...,struct drm_i915_private *T,...) {
<+...
(
-DRM_INFO(
+drm_info(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_ERROR(
+drm_err(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_WARN(
+drm_warn(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
+drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
+drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm,
...)
)
...+>
}
@@
identifier fn, T;
@@
fn(...) {
...
struct drm_i915_private *T = ...;
<+...
(
-DRM_INFO(
+drm_info(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_ERROR(
+drm_err(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_WARN(
+drm_warn(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
+drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
+drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm,
...)
)
...+>
}
New checkpatch warnings were fixed manually.
Signed-off-by: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.c | 43 +++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.c
index b7ad0b534790..471e668e4ba0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.c
@@ -182,8 +182,9 @@ static void intel_lvds_pps_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 4 &&
pps->t1_t2 == 0 && pps->t5 == 0 && pps->t3 == 0 && pps->tx == 0) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Panel power timings uninitialized, "
- "setting defaults\n");
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "Panel power timings uninitialized, "
+ "setting defaults\n");
/* Set T2 to 40ms and T5 to 200ms in 100 usec units */
pps->t1_t2 = 40 * 10;
pps->t5 = 200 * 10;
@@ -192,10 +193,10 @@ static void intel_lvds_pps_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
pps->tx = 200 * 10;
}
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("LVDS PPS:t1+t2 %d t3 %d t4 %d t5 %d tx %d "
- "divider %d port %d powerdown_on_reset %d\n",
- pps->t1_t2, pps->t3, pps->t4, pps->t5, pps->tx,
- pps->divider, pps->port, pps->powerdown_on_reset);
+ drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm, "LVDS PPS:t1+t2 %d t3 %d t4 %d t5 %d tx %d "
+ "divider %d port %d powerdown_on_reset %d\n",
+ pps->t1_t2, pps->t3, pps->t4, pps->t5, pps->tx,
+ pps->divider, pps->port, pps->powerdown_on_reset);
}
static void intel_lvds_pps_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
@@ -317,7 +318,8 @@ static void intel_enable_lvds(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, lvds_encoder->reg);
if (intel_de_wait_for_set(dev_priv, PP_STATUS(0), PP_ON, 5000))
- DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for panel to power on\n");
+ drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "timed out waiting for panel to power on\n");
intel_panel_enable_backlight(pipe_config, conn_state);
}
@@ -332,7 +334,8 @@ static void intel_disable_lvds(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
intel_de_write(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(0),
intel_de_read(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(0)) & ~PANEL_POWER_ON);
if (intel_de_wait_for_clear(dev_priv, PP_STATUS(0), PP_ON, 1000))
- DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for panel to power off\n");
+ drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "timed out waiting for panel to power off\n");
intel_de_write(dev_priv, lvds_encoder->reg,
intel_de_read(dev_priv, lvds_encoder->reg) & ~LVDS_PORT_EN);
@@ -398,7 +401,7 @@ static int intel_lvds_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder,
/* Should never happen!! */
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 4 && intel_crtc->pipe == 0) {
- DRM_ERROR("Can't support LVDS on pipe A\n");
+ drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "Can't support LVDS on pipe A\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -408,8 +411,9 @@ static int intel_lvds_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder,
lvds_bpp = 6*3;
if (lvds_bpp != pipe_config->pipe_bpp && !pipe_config->bw_constrained) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("forcing display bpp (was %d) to LVDS (%d)\n",
- pipe_config->pipe_bpp, lvds_bpp);
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "forcing display bpp (was %d) to LVDS (%d)\n",
+ pipe_config->pipe_bpp, lvds_bpp);
pipe_config->pipe_bpp = lvds_bpp;
}
@@ -833,7 +837,8 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
}
if (!dev_priv->vbt.int_lvds_support) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Internal LVDS support disabled by VBT\n");
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "Internal LVDS support disabled by VBT\n");
return;
}
@@ -852,10 +857,12 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
pin = GMBUS_PIN_PANEL;
if (!intel_bios_is_lvds_present(dev_priv, &pin)) {
if ((lvds & LVDS_PORT_EN) == 0) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LVDS is not present in VBT\n");
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "LVDS is not present in VBT\n");
return;
}
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LVDS is not present in VBT, but enabled anyway\n");
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "LVDS is not present in VBT, but enabled anyway\n");
}
lvds_encoder = kzalloc(sizeof(*lvds_encoder), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -969,7 +976,7 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
*/
fixed_mode = intel_encoder_current_mode(intel_encoder);
if (fixed_mode) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("using current (BIOS) mode: ");
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "using current (BIOS) mode: ");
drm_mode_debug_printmodeline(fixed_mode);
fixed_mode->type |= DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED;
}
@@ -985,8 +992,8 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
intel_panel_setup_backlight(connector, INVALID_PIPE);
lvds_encoder->is_dual_link = compute_is_dual_link_lvds(lvds_encoder);
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("detected %s-link lvds configuration\n",
- lvds_encoder->is_dual_link ? "dual" : "single");
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "detected %s-link lvds configuration\n",
+ lvds_encoder->is_dual_link ? "dual" : "single");
lvds_encoder->a3_power = lvds & LVDS_A3_POWER_MASK;
@@ -995,7 +1002,7 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
failed:
mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No LVDS modes found, disabling.\n");
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "No LVDS modes found, disabling.\n");
drm_connector_cleanup(connector);
drm_encoder_cleanup(encoder);
kfree(lvds_encoder);
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-26 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-26 10:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915/display: conversion to drm_device based logging macros Wambui Karuga
2020-02-26 10:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/dsb: convert " Wambui Karuga
2020-02-26 10:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915/fbc: " Wambui Karuga
2020-02-26 10:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/fbdev: convert to drm_device based logging Wambui Karuga
2020-02-26 10:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/fifo_underrun: " Wambui Karuga
2020-02-26 10:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/gmbus: convert to drm_device based logging, Wambui Karuga
2020-02-26 10:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/hdcp: convert to struct drm_device based logging Wambui Karuga
2020-02-26 10:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/hotplug: convert to " Wambui Karuga
2020-02-26 10:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/lpe_audio: convert to drm_device based logging macros Wambui Karuga
2020-02-26 10:11 ` Wambui Karuga [this message]
2020-02-26 10:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/overlay: convert to drm_device based logging Wambui Karuga
2020-02-26 19:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: conversion to drm_device based logging macros (rev3) Patchwork
2020-02-26 20:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-02-27 10:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: conversion to drm_device based logging macros (rev4) Patchwork
2020-02-27 10:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-03-03 13:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/display: conversion to drm_device based logging macros (rev5) Patchwork
2020-03-03 15:20 ` Jani Nikula
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-09 15:12 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915/display: conversion to drm_device based logging macros Jani Nikula
2020-03-10 8:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/lvds: convert " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200226101138.15435-10-wambui.karugax@gmail.com \
--to=wambui.karugax@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox