From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 3/8] drm/i915: Add intel_bw_get_*_state helpers
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:53:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227155353.GQ13686@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224153240.9047-4-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 05:32:35PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Add correspondent helpers to be able to get old/new bandwidth
> global state object.
>
> v2: - Fixed typo in function call
> v3: - Changed new functions naming to use convention proposed
> by Jani Nikula, i.e intel_bw_* in intel_bw.c file.
And now they no longer match the naming pattern used by all the
other simialr functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h | 9 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> index 58b264bc318d..bdad7476dc7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> @@ -374,8 +374,35 @@ static unsigned int intel_bw_data_rate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return data_rate;
> }
>
> -static struct intel_bw_state *
> -intel_atomic_get_bw_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> +struct intel_bw_state *
> +intel_bw_get_old_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> + struct intel_global_state *bw_state;
> +
> + bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_global_obj_state(state, &dev_priv->bw_obj);
> + if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> + return ERR_CAST(bw_state);
> +
> + return to_intel_bw_state(bw_state);
> +}
> +
> +struct intel_bw_state *
> +intel_bw_get_new_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> + struct intel_global_state *bw_state;
> +
> + bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_global_obj_state(state, &dev_priv->bw_obj);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> + return ERR_CAST(bw_state);
> +
> + return to_intel_bw_state(bw_state);
> +}
> +
> +struct intel_bw_state *
> +intel_bw_get_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> struct intel_global_state *bw_state;
> @@ -420,7 +447,7 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> old_active_planes == new_active_planes)
> continue;
>
> - bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> + bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);
> if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> index a8aa7624c5aa..b5f61463922f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,15 @@ struct intel_bw_state {
>
> #define to_intel_bw_state(x) container_of((x), struct intel_bw_state, base)
>
> +struct intel_bw_state *
> +intel_bw_get_old_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> +
> +struct intel_bw_state *
> +intel_bw_get_new_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> +
> +struct intel_bw_state *
> +intel_bw_get_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> +
> void intel_bw_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> int intel_bw_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> --
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 15:32 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 0/8] Refactor Gen11+ SAGV support Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 1/8] drm/i915: Start passing latency as parameter Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-27 16:28 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 2/8] drm/i915: Introduce skl_plane_wm_level accessor Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-27 15:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-28 12:23 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 3/8] drm/i915: Add intel_bw_get_*_state helpers Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-27 15:53 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 4/8] drm/i915: Introduce more *_state_changed indicators Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-25 14:57 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-27 16:12 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-28 8:56 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-28 16:12 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-29 9:34 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 5/8] drm/i915: Refactor intel_can_enable_sagv Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-25 14:59 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-27 11:46 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 6/8] drm/i915: Added required new PCode commands Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 7/8] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-25 15:00 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-27 16:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-02 13:15 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 8/8] drm/i915: Enable SAGV support for Gen12 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-24 18:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Refactor Gen11+ SAGV support Patchwork
2020-02-24 18:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-02-24 19:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-02-26 22:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Refactor Gen11+ SAGV support (rev5) Patchwork
2020-02-26 22:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-02-26 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-02-27 15:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Refactor Gen11+ SAGV support (rev6) Patchwork
2020-02-27 15:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-02-27 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-02-28 17:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200227155353.GQ13686@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox