From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/51] drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:07:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200316090732.GH2363188@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa1dad07-9697-dea2-2b07-46f5ca7c0b9d@suse.de>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:59:10AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 02.03.20 um 23:26 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > The cleanup here is somewhat tricky, since we can't tell apart the
> > allocated minor index from 0. So register a cleanup action first, and
> > if the index allocation fails, unregister that cleanup action again to
> > avoid bad mistakes.
> >
> > The kdev for the minor already handles NULL, so no problem there.
> >
> > Hence add drmm_remove_action() to the drm_managed library.
> >
> > v2: Make pointer math around void ** consistent with what Laurent
> > suggested.
> >
> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 74 +++++++++++++----------------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c | 28 +++++++++++++
> > include/drm/drm_managed.h | 4 ++
> > 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> > index 23e5b0e7e041..29d106195ab3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> > @@ -93,19 +93,35 @@ static struct drm_minor **drm_minor_get_slot(struct drm_device *dev,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void drm_minor_alloc_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_minor *minor = data;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + put_device(minor->kdev);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > + idr_remove(&drm_minors_idr, minor->index);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int drm_minor_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int type)
> > {
> > struct drm_minor *minor;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int r;
> >
> > - minor = kzalloc(sizeof(*minor), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + minor = drmm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*minor), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!minor)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > minor->type = type;
> > minor->dev = dev;
> >
> > + r = drmm_add_action(dev, drm_minor_alloc_release, minor);
> > + if (r)
> > + return r;
> > +
> > idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > r = idr_alloc(&drm_minors_idr,
> > @@ -116,47 +132,18 @@ static int drm_minor_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int type)
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > idr_preload_end();
> >
> > - if (r < 0)
> > - goto err_free;
> > + if (r < 0) {
> > + drmm_remove_action(dev, drm_minor_alloc_release, minor);
> > + return r;
> > + }
> >
> > minor->index = r;
> > -
> > minor->kdev = drm_sysfs_minor_alloc(minor);
> > - if (IS_ERR(minor->kdev)) {
> > - r = PTR_ERR(minor->kdev);
> > - goto err_index;
> > - }
> > + if (IS_ERR(minor->kdev))
> > + return PTR_ERR(minor->kdev);
> >
> > *drm_minor_get_slot(dev, type) = minor;
> > return 0;
> > -
> > -err_index:
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > - idr_remove(&drm_minors_idr, minor->index);
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > -err_free:
> > - kfree(minor);
> > - return r;
> > -}
>
> TBH, I think you're reducing code quality by removing the rollback code
> from init functions, just for the sake of it.
>
> Specifically in this case here, you saved a few lines of code, but the
> overall flow is way more complicated to follow. That's typically a
> reliably source of bugs. This call to drmm_remove_action() just makes it
> worse.
>
> Rather, see my remark on OOP destruction in patch 21. For now, I'd focus
> on the device cleanup and leave init functions as they are.
Ah, I can simplify this with add_action_or_reset. This removes the only
user of drmm_remove_action, which I think is actually a good thing :-)
-Daniel
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> > -
> > -static void drm_minor_free(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int type)
> > -{
> > - struct drm_minor **slot, *minor;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > -
> > - slot = drm_minor_get_slot(dev, type);
> > - minor = *slot;
> > - if (!minor)
> > - return;
> > -
> > - put_device(minor->kdev);
> > -
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > - idr_remove(&drm_minors_idr, minor->index);
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > -
> > - kfree(minor);
> > - *slot = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > static int drm_minor_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int type)
> > @@ -678,16 +665,16 @@ int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_RENDER)) {
> > ret = drm_minor_alloc(dev, DRM_MINOR_RENDER);
> > if (ret)
> > - goto err_minors;
> > + goto err;
> > }
> >
> > ret = drm_minor_alloc(dev, DRM_MINOR_PRIMARY);
> > if (ret)
> > - goto err_minors;
> > + goto err;
> >
> > ret = drm_legacy_create_map_hash(dev);
> > if (ret)
> > - goto err_minors;
> > + goto err;
> >
> > drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_init(dev);
> >
> > @@ -695,7 +682,7 @@ int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > ret = drm_gem_init(dev);
> > if (ret) {
> > DRM_ERROR("Cannot initialize graphics execution manager (GEM)\n");
> > - goto err_ctxbitmap;
> > + goto err;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -708,10 +695,6 @@ int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > err_setunique:
> > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM))
> > drm_gem_destroy(dev);
> > -err_ctxbitmap:
> > -err_minors:
> > - drm_minor_free(dev, DRM_MINOR_PRIMARY);
> > - drm_minor_free(dev, DRM_MINOR_RENDER);
> > err:
> > drm_managed_release(dev);
> >
> > @@ -776,9 +759,6 @@ void drm_dev_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
> >
> > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM))
> > drm_gem_destroy(dev);
> > -
> > - drm_minor_free(dev, DRM_MINOR_PRIMARY);
> > - drm_minor_free(dev, DRM_MINOR_RENDER);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_fini);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> > index 514d5bd42446..0883615c2088 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,34 @@ int __drmm_add_action(struct drm_device *dev,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drmm_add_action);
> >
> > +void drmm_remove_action(struct drm_device *dev,
> > + drmres_release_t action,
> > + void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct drmres *dr = NULL, *tmp;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + if (!data)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->managed.lock, flags);
> > + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &dev->managed.resources, node.entry) {
> > + if (tmp->node.release == action &&
> > + *(void **)&tmp->data == data) {
> > + dr = tmp;
> > + del_dr(dev, dr);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->managed.lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (WARN_ON(!dr))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + kfree(dr);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_remove_action);
> > +
> > void *drmm_kmalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
> > {
> > struct drmres *dr;
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_managed.h b/include/drm/drm_managed.h
> > index 89e6fce9f689..5280209dff92 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_managed.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_managed.h
> > @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ int __must_check __drmm_add_action(struct drm_device *dev,
> > drmres_release_t action,
> > void *data, const char *name);
> >
> > +void drmm_remove_action(struct drm_device *dev,
> > + drmres_release_t action,
> > + void *data);
> > +
> > void drmm_add_final_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *parent);
> >
> > void *drmm_kmalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) __malloc;
> >
>
> --
> Thomas Zimmermann
> Graphics Driver Developer
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
> Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
> Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-16 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-02 22:25 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/51] drm_device managed resources, v4 Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/51] mm/sl[uo]b: export __kmalloc_track(_node)_caller Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/51] drm/i915: Don't clear drvdata in ->release Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/51] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03 8:04 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-03-03 8:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 19:38 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-11 9:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/51] " Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-11 9:47 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-16 8:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-11 9:14 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-16 8:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/51] drm: Set final_kfree in drm_dev_alloc Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03 7:44 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-07 8:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-23 11:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-11 9:09 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/51] drm/mipi_dbi: Use drmm_add_final_kfree in all drivers Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/51] drm/udl: Use drmm_add_final_kfree Daniel Vetter
2020-03-11 9:10 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/51] drm/qxl: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03 7:44 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/51] drm/i915: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/51] drm/cirrus: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03 7:49 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-03 8:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/51] drm/v3d: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/51] drm/tidss: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/51] drm/mcde: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/51] drm/vgem: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/51] drm/vkms: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/51] drm/repaper: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:27 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/51] drm/ingenic: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:27 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/51] drm/gm12u320: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:27 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/51] drm/<drivers>: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/51] drm: Cleanups after drmm_add_final_kfree rollout Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03 8:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-06 20:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/51] " Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-11 9:15 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/51] drm: Handle dev->unique with drmm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-23 10:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-11 9:19 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/51] drm: Use drmm_ for drm_dev_init cleanup Daniel Vetter
2020-03-11 9:39 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-16 9:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/51] drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-03-11 9:59 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-16 9:07 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/51] drm: Manage drm_gem_init " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07 8:20 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/51] drm: Manage drm_vblank_cleanup " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07 8:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/51] drm: Garbage collect drm_dev_fini Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07 8:30 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/51] drm: Manage drm_mode_config_init with drmm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/51] drm/bochs: Remove leftover drm_atomic_helper_shutdown Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03 7:49 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/51] drm/bochs: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03 7:50 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-06 20:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/51] drm/cirrus: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03 7:51 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/51] drm/cirrus: Fully embrace devm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03 7:51 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/51] drm/ingenic: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:17 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/51] drm/mcde: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:18 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/51] drm/mcde: More devm_drm_dev_init Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/51] drm/meson: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/51] drm/pl111: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07 8:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/51] drm/rcar-du: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/51] drm/rockchip: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07 8:38 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/51] drm/stm: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07 9:25 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/51] drm/shmob: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/51] drm/mtk: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07 9:26 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/51] drm/tidss: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/51] drm/gm12u320: More drmm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/51] drm/gm12u320: Use devm_drm_dev_init Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/51] drm/gm12u320: Use helpers for shutdown/suspend/resume Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/51] drm/gm12u320: Simplify upload work Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/51] drm/repaper: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07 9:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/51] drm/mipi-dbi: Move drm_mode_config_init into mipi library Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 48/51] drm/mipi-dbi: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 49/51] drm/udl: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 50/51] drm/udl: drop drm_driver.release hook Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03 7:57 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 51/51] drm: Add docs for managed resources Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07 10:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 23:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm_device managed resources (rev2) Patchwork
2020-03-02 23:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-03-02 23:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2020-03-02 23:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-03-03 9:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm_device managed resources (rev4) Patchwork
2020-03-03 9:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-03-03 9:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2020-03-03 9:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-03-03 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm_device managed resources (rev2) Patchwork
2020-03-03 18:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm_device managed resources (rev4) Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-23 14:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/51] drm_device managed resources, v5 Daniel Vetter
2020-03-23 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/51] drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-03-24 8:54 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-24 21:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-25 9:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-02-27 18:14 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/51] drm managed resources, v3 Daniel Vetter
2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/51] drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-02-21 21:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/51] drm managed resources, v2 Daniel Vetter
2020-02-21 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/51] drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_ Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200316090732.GH2363188@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox