Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/51] drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:07:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200316090732.GH2363188@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa1dad07-9697-dea2-2b07-46f5ca7c0b9d@suse.de>

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:59:10AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Am 02.03.20 um 23:26 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > The cleanup here is somewhat tricky, since we can't tell apart the
> > allocated minor index from 0. So register a cleanup action first, and
> > if the index allocation fails, unregister that cleanup action again to
> > avoid bad mistakes.
> > 
> > The kdev for the minor already handles NULL, so no problem there.
> > 
> > Hence add drmm_remove_action() to the drm_managed library.
> > 
> > v2: Make pointer math around void ** consistent with what Laurent
> > suggested.
> > 
> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c     | 74 +++++++++++++----------------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c | 28 +++++++++++++
> >  include/drm/drm_managed.h     |  4 ++
> >  3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> > index 23e5b0e7e041..29d106195ab3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> > @@ -93,19 +93,35 @@ static struct drm_minor **drm_minor_get_slot(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void drm_minor_alloc_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *data)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_minor *minor = data;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +	put_device(minor->kdev);
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > +	idr_remove(&drm_minors_idr, minor->index);
> > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int drm_minor_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int type)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_minor *minor;
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> >  	int r;
> >  
> > -	minor = kzalloc(sizeof(*minor), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	minor = drmm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*minor), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!minor)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> >  	minor->type = type;
> >  	minor->dev = dev;
> >  
> > +	r = drmm_add_action(dev, drm_minor_alloc_release, minor);
> > +	if (r)
> > +		return r;
> > +
> >  	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> >  	r = idr_alloc(&drm_minors_idr,
> > @@ -116,47 +132,18 @@ static int drm_minor_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int type)
> >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> >  	idr_preload_end();
> >  
> > -	if (r < 0)
> > -		goto err_free;
> > +	if (r < 0) {
> > +		drmm_remove_action(dev, drm_minor_alloc_release, minor);
> > +		return r;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	minor->index = r;
> > -
> >  	minor->kdev = drm_sysfs_minor_alloc(minor);
> > -	if (IS_ERR(minor->kdev)) {
> > -		r = PTR_ERR(minor->kdev);
> > -		goto err_index;
> > -	}
> > +	if (IS_ERR(minor->kdev))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(minor->kdev);
> >  
> >  	*drm_minor_get_slot(dev, type) = minor;
> >  	return 0;
> > -
> > -err_index:
> > -	spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > -	idr_remove(&drm_minors_idr, minor->index);
> > -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > -err_free:
> > -	kfree(minor);
> > -	return r;
> > -}
> 
> TBH, I think you're reducing code quality by removing the rollback code
> from init functions, just for the sake of it.
> 
> Specifically in this case here, you saved a few lines of code, but the
> overall flow is way more complicated to follow. That's typically a
> reliably source of bugs. This call to drmm_remove_action() just makes it
> worse.
> 
> Rather, see my remark on OOP destruction in patch 21. For now, I'd focus
> on the device cleanup and leave init functions as they are.

Ah, I can simplify this with add_action_or_reset. This removes the only
user of drmm_remove_action, which I think is actually a good thing :-)
-Daniel

> 
> Best regards
> Thomas
> 
> > -
> > -static void drm_minor_free(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int type)
> > -{
> > -	struct drm_minor **slot, *minor;
> > -	unsigned long flags;
> > -
> > -	slot = drm_minor_get_slot(dev, type);
> > -	minor = *slot;
> > -	if (!minor)
> > -		return;
> > -
> > -	put_device(minor->kdev);
> > -
> > -	spin_lock_irqsave(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > -	idr_remove(&drm_minors_idr, minor->index);
> > -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm_minor_lock, flags);
> > -
> > -	kfree(minor);
> > -	*slot = NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int drm_minor_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int type)
> > @@ -678,16 +665,16 @@ int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  	if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_RENDER)) {
> >  		ret = drm_minor_alloc(dev, DRM_MINOR_RENDER);
> >  		if (ret)
> > -			goto err_minors;
> > +			goto err;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	ret = drm_minor_alloc(dev, DRM_MINOR_PRIMARY);
> >  	if (ret)
> > -		goto err_minors;
> > +		goto err;
> >  
> >  	ret = drm_legacy_create_map_hash(dev);
> >  	if (ret)
> > -		goto err_minors;
> > +		goto err;
> >  
> >  	drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_init(dev);
> >  
> > @@ -695,7 +682,7 @@ int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  		ret = drm_gem_init(dev);
> >  		if (ret) {
> >  			DRM_ERROR("Cannot initialize graphics execution manager (GEM)\n");
> > -			goto err_ctxbitmap;
> > +			goto err;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -708,10 +695,6 @@ int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  err_setunique:
> >  	if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM))
> >  		drm_gem_destroy(dev);
> > -err_ctxbitmap:
> > -err_minors:
> > -	drm_minor_free(dev, DRM_MINOR_PRIMARY);
> > -	drm_minor_free(dev, DRM_MINOR_RENDER);
> >  err:
> >  	drm_managed_release(dev);
> >  
> > @@ -776,9 +759,6 @@ void drm_dev_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  
> >  	if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM))
> >  		drm_gem_destroy(dev);
> > -
> > -	drm_minor_free(dev, DRM_MINOR_PRIMARY);
> > -	drm_minor_free(dev, DRM_MINOR_RENDER);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_fini);
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> > index 514d5bd42446..0883615c2088 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,34 @@ int __drmm_add_action(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drmm_add_action);
> >  
> > +void drmm_remove_action(struct drm_device *dev,
> > +			drmres_release_t action,
> > +			void *data)
> > +{
> > +	struct drmres *dr = NULL, *tmp;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +	if (!data)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->managed.lock, flags);
> > +	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &dev->managed.resources, node.entry) {
> > +		if (tmp->node.release == action &&
> > +		    *(void **)&tmp->data == data) {
> > +			dr = tmp;
> > +			del_dr(dev, dr);
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->managed.lock, flags);
> > +
> > +	if (WARN_ON(!dr))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	kfree(dr);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_remove_action);
> > +
> >  void *drmm_kmalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
> >  {
> >  	struct drmres *dr;
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_managed.h b/include/drm/drm_managed.h
> > index 89e6fce9f689..5280209dff92 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_managed.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_managed.h
> > @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ int __must_check __drmm_add_action(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  				   drmres_release_t action,
> >  				   void *data, const char *name);
> >  
> > +void drmm_remove_action(struct drm_device *dev,
> > +			drmres_release_t action,
> > +			void *data);
> > +
> >  void drmm_add_final_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *parent);
> >  
> >  void *drmm_kmalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) __malloc;
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Zimmermann
> Graphics Driver Developer
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
> Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
> Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
> 




-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-16  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-02 22:25 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/51] drm_device managed resources, v4 Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/51] mm/sl[uo]b: export __kmalloc_track(_node)_caller Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/51] drm/i915: Don't clear drvdata in ->release Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/51] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03  8:04   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-03-03  8:25     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03  8:44   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 19:38     ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-11  9:07   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/51] " Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-11  9:47     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-16  8:45     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-11  9:14   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-16  8:50     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/51] drm: Set final_kfree in drm_dev_alloc Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03  7:44   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-07  8:06   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-23 11:02     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-11  9:09   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/51] drm/mipi_dbi: Use drmm_add_final_kfree in all drivers Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/51] drm/udl: Use drmm_add_final_kfree Daniel Vetter
2020-03-11  9:10   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/51] drm/qxl: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03  7:44   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/51] drm/i915: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/51] drm/cirrus: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03  7:49   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-03  8:27     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/51] drm/v3d: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/51] drm/tidss: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/51] drm/mcde: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/51] drm/vgem: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/51] drm/vkms: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/51] drm/repaper: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:27   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/51] drm/ingenic: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:27   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/51] drm/gm12u320: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:27   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/51] drm/<drivers>: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:28   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/51] drm: Cleanups after drmm_add_final_kfree rollout Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03  8:45   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:31     ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-06 20:29   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/51] " Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-11  9:15   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/51] drm: Handle dev->unique with drmm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:37   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-23 10:54     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-11  9:19   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/51] drm: Use drmm_ for drm_dev_init cleanup Daniel Vetter
2020-03-11  9:39   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-16  9:02     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/51] drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-03-11  9:59   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-16  9:07     ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/51] drm: Manage drm_gem_init " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07  8:20   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/51] drm: Manage drm_vblank_cleanup " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07  8:28   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/51] drm: Garbage collect drm_dev_fini Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07  8:30   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/51] drm: Manage drm_mode_config_init with drmm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:04   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/51] drm/bochs: Remove leftover drm_atomic_helper_shutdown Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03  7:49   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/51] drm/bochs: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03  7:50   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-06 20:14   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/51] drm/cirrus: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03  7:51   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/51] drm/cirrus: Fully embrace devm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03  7:51   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/51] drm/ingenic: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:17   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/51] drm/mcde: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-06 20:18   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/51] drm/mcde: More devm_drm_dev_init Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/51] drm/meson: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/51] drm/pl111: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07  8:37   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/51] drm/rcar-du: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/51] drm/rockchip: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07  8:38   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/51] drm/stm: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07  9:25   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/51] drm/shmob: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/51] drm/mtk: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07  9:26   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/51] drm/tidss: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/51] drm/gm12u320: More drmm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/51] drm/gm12u320: Use devm_drm_dev_init Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/51] drm/gm12u320: Use helpers for shutdown/suspend/resume Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/51] drm/gm12u320: Simplify upload work Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/51] drm/repaper: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07  9:31   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/51] drm/mipi-dbi: Move drm_mode_config_init into mipi library Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 48/51] drm/mipi-dbi: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 49/51] drm/udl: " Daniel Vetter
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 50/51] drm/udl: drop drm_driver.release hook Daniel Vetter
2020-03-03  7:57   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-02 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 51/51] drm: Add docs for managed resources Daniel Vetter
2020-03-07 10:07   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-02 23:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm_device managed resources (rev2) Patchwork
2020-03-02 23:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-03-02 23:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2020-03-02 23:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-03-03  9:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm_device managed resources (rev4) Patchwork
2020-03-03  9:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-03-03  9:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2020-03-03  9:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-03-03 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm_device managed resources (rev2) Patchwork
2020-03-03 18:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm_device managed resources (rev4) Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-23 14:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/51] drm_device managed resources, v5 Daniel Vetter
2020-03-23 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/51] drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-03-24  8:54   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-03-24 21:36   ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-03-25  9:07     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-02-27 18:14 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/51] drm managed resources, v3 Daniel Vetter
2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/51] drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_ Daniel Vetter
2020-02-21 21:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/51] drm managed resources, v2 Daniel Vetter
2020-02-21 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/51] drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_ Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200316090732.GH2363188@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox