Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/26] drm/i915: Kill context before taking ctx->mutex
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:28:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200623142843.423594-26-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200623142843.423594-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Killing context before taking ctx->mutex fixes a hang in
gem_ctx_persistence.close-replace-race, where lut_close
takes obj->resv.lock which is already held by execbuf,
causing a stalling indefinitely.

[ 1904.342847] 2 locks held by gem_ctx_persist/11520:
[ 1904.342849]  #0: ffff8882188e4968 (&ctx->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: context_close+0xe6/0x850 [i915]
[ 1904.342941]  #1: ffff88821c58a5a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lut_close+0x2c2/0xba0 [i915]
[ 1904.343033] 3 locks held by gem_ctx_persist/11521:
[ 1904.343035]  #0: ffffc900008ff938 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x103d/0x54c0 [i915]
[ 1904.343157]  #1: ffff88821c58a5a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: eb_validate_vmas+0x602/0x2010 [i915]
[ 1904.343267]  #2: ffff88820afd9200 (&vm->mutex/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin_ww+0x335/0x2300 [i915]

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c | 24 ++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
index b9d38e8edb5b..3c89150f7262 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -623,6 +623,18 @@ static void context_close(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
 	i915_gem_context_set_closed(ctx);
 	mutex_unlock(&ctx->engines_mutex);
 
+	/*
+	 * If the user has disabled hangchecking, we can not be sure that
+	 * the batches will ever complete after the context is closed,
+	 * keeping the context and all resources pinned forever. So in this
+	 * case we opt to forcibly kill off all remaining requests on
+	 * context close.
+	 */
+	if (!i915_gem_context_is_persistent(ctx) ||
+	    !i915_modparams.enable_hangcheck)
+		kill_context(ctx);
+
+
 	mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
 
 	set_closed_name(ctx);
@@ -641,18 +653,6 @@ static void context_close(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
 	lut_close(ctx);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
-
-	/*
-	 * If the user has disabled hangchecking, we can not be sure that
-	 * the batches will ever complete after the context is closed,
-	 * keeping the context and all resources pinned forever. So in this
-	 * case we opt to forcibly kill off all remaining requests on
-	 * context close.
-	 */
-	if (!i915_gem_context_is_persistent(ctx) ||
-	    !i915_modparams.enable_hangcheck)
-		kill_context(ctx);
-
 	i915_gem_context_put(ctx);
 }
 
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-23 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-23 14:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/26] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/26] drm/i915: Revert relocation chaining commits Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/26] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/26] drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-24  7:10   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-06-24  7:43     ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-24  7:49       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-06-24  8:27         ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-29 12:07   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-29 12:32   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-29 13:44     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/26] drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-26 13:32   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-06-29 12:56   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/26] drm/i915: Parse command buffer earlier in eb_relocate(slow) Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-26 14:41   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-06-29 10:40     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-29 11:15       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-06-29 11:18         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-29 14:42   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/26] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-29 15:08   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-30 11:52     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-30 12:31       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-30 14:07         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/26] drm/i915/gem: Make eb_add_lut interruptible wait on object lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-26 13:52   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-06-29 15:14   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-30 11:56     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/26] drm/i915: Use per object locking in execbuf, v12 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/26] drm/i915: Use ww locking in intel_renderstate Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/26] drm/i915: Add ww context handling to context_barrier_task Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/26] drm/i915: Nuke arguments to eb_pin_engine Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/26] drm/i915: Pin engine before pinning all objects, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/26] drm/i915: Rework intel_context pinning to do everything outside of pin_mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/26] drm/i915: Make sure execbuffer always passes ww state to i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-25 14:32   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/26] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object/client_blt.c to use ww locking as well, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/26] drm/i915: Kill last user of intel_context_create_request outside of selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/26] drm/i915: Convert i915_perf to ww locking as well Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/26] drm/i915: Dirty hack to fix selftests locking inversion Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/26] drm/i915/selftests: Fix locking inversion in lrc selftest Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/26] drm/i915: Use ww pinning for intel_context_create_request() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/26] drm/i915: Move i915_vma_lock in the selftests to avoid lock inversion, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/26] drm/i915: Add ww locking to vm_fault_gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/26] drm/i915: Add ww locking to pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/26] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the pin mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 14:28 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2020-06-24 11:05   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Kill context before taking ctx->mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-30 14:16     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-02 13:26       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-02 14:51         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-03 10:35           ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-06-23 15:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/26] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only" Chris Wilson
2020-06-24 11:19   ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-23 15:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [01/26] " Patchwork
2020-06-24 11:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/26] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only" (rev2) Patchwork
2020-06-24 11:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-06-24 12:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-07-01 13:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200623142843.423594-26-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox