From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Helper for checking DDI_BUF_CTL Idle status
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 00:00:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630210007.GT6112@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630204922.GB20459@intel.com>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 01:49:22PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:30:16PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:26:40PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > > Modify the helper to add a fixed delay or poll with timeout
> > > based on platform specification to check for either Idle bit
> > > set (DDI_BUF_CTL is idle for disable case)
> > >
> > > v3:
> > > * Change the timeout to 16usecs (Ville)
> > > v2:
> > > * Use 2 separate functions or idle and active (Ville)
> >
> > Missing changelog? Did somehting change?
> >
>
> No its a v3 for thsi patch, but patch 2/2 is a v4 so published
> both patches with a v4,
Doh. The changelog is backwards so didn't even notice.
>
> does this now look good with v3, timeout changed to 16 usecs?
>
> Manasi
>
> > >
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > index 884b507c5f55..052a74625a61 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > @@ -1184,16 +1184,15 @@ static void intel_prepare_hdmi_ddi_buffers(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > > static void intel_wait_ddi_buf_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > enum port port)
> > > {
> > > - i915_reg_t reg = DDI_BUF_CTL(port);
> > > - int i;
> > > -
> > > - for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> > > - udelay(1);
> > > - if (intel_de_read(dev_priv, reg) & DDI_BUF_IS_IDLE)
> > > - return;
> > > + if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
> > > + udelay(16);
> > > + return;
> > > }
> > > - drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "Timeout waiting for DDI BUF %c idle bit\n",
> > > - port_name(port));
> > > +
> > > + if (wait_for_us((intel_de_read(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(port)) &
> > > + DDI_BUF_IS_IDLE), 16))
> > > + drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "Timeout waiting for DDI BUF %c to get idle\n",
> > > + port_name(port));
> > > }
> > >
> > > static u32 hsw_pll_to_ddi_pll_sel(const struct intel_shared_dpll *pll)
> > > --
> > > 2.19.1
> >
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-30 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-26 23:26 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Helper for checking DDI_BUF_CTL Idle status Manasi Navare
2020-06-26 23:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Helper to check for DDI BUF status to get active Manasi Navare
2020-06-29 19:21 ` Manasi Navare
2020-06-30 21:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-06-30 23:14 ` Manasi Navare
2020-06-27 9:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v4,1/2] drm/i915/dp: Helper for checking DDI_BUF_CTL Idle status Patchwork
2020-06-29 7:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-06-29 19:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] " Manasi Navare
2020-06-30 15:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-06-30 20:49 ` Manasi Navare
2020-06-30 21:00 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-06-30 21:03 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-06-30 21:10 ` Manasi Navare
2020-06-30 21:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200630210007.GT6112@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox