Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/23] drm/i915: Add ww locking to pin_to_display_plane
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 13:45:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200714114516.3073222-23-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200714114516.3073222-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
index 8ebceebd11b0..c0d153284984 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ void i915_gem_object_flush_if_display(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 	i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
 }
 
+void i915_gem_object_flush_if_display_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
+{
+	if (i915_gem_object_is_framebuffer(obj))
+		__i915_gem_object_flush_for_display(obj);
+}
+
 /**
  * Moves a single object to the WC read, and possibly write domain.
  * @obj: object to act on
@@ -197,18 +203,12 @@ int i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = i915_gem_object_lock_interruptible(obj, NULL);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
 	/* Always invalidate stale cachelines */
 	if (obj->cache_level != cache_level) {
 		i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(obj, cache_level);
 		obj->cache_dirty = true;
 	}
 
-	i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
-
 	/* The cache-level will be applied when each vma is rebound. */
 	return i915_gem_object_unbind(obj,
 				      I915_GEM_OBJECT_UNBIND_ACTIVE |
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ int i915_gem_set_caching_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	struct drm_i915_gem_caching *args = data;
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
 	enum i915_cache_level level;
+	struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	switch (args->caching) {
@@ -293,7 +294,18 @@ int i915_gem_set_caching_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(obj, level);
+	i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, true);
+retry:
+	ret = i915_gem_object_lock(obj, &ww);
+	if (!ret)
+		ret = i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(obj, level);
+
+	if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
+		ret = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww);
+		if (!ret)
+			goto retry;
+	}
+	i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&ww);
 
 out:
 	i915_gem_object_put(obj);
@@ -313,6 +325,7 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 				     unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
+	struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
 	struct i915_vma *vma;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -320,6 +333,11 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	if (HAS_LMEM(i915) && !i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
+	i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, true);
+retry:
+	ret = i915_gem_object_lock(obj, &ww);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err;
 	/*
 	 * The display engine is not coherent with the LLC cache on gen6.  As
 	 * a result, we make sure that the pinning that is about to occur is
@@ -334,7 +352,7 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 					      HAS_WT(i915) ?
 					      I915_CACHE_WT : I915_CACHE_NONE);
 	if (ret)
-		return ERR_PTR(ret);
+		goto err;
 
 	/*
 	 * As the user may map the buffer once pinned in the display plane
@@ -347,18 +365,31 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	vma = ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
 	if ((flags & PIN_MAPPABLE) == 0 &&
 	    (!view || view->type == I915_GGTT_VIEW_NORMAL))
-		vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(obj, view, 0, alignment,
-					       flags |
-					       PIN_MAPPABLE |
-					       PIN_NONBLOCK);
-	if (IS_ERR(vma))
-		vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(obj, view, 0, alignment, flags);
-	if (IS_ERR(vma))
-		return vma;
+		vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(obj, &ww, view, 0, alignment,
+						  flags | PIN_MAPPABLE |
+						  PIN_NONBLOCK);
+	if (IS_ERR(vma) && vma != ERR_PTR(-EDEADLK))
+		vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(obj, &ww, view, 0,
+						  alignment, flags);
+	if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(vma);
+		goto err;
+	}
 
 	vma->display_alignment = max_t(u64, vma->display_alignment, alignment);
 
-	i915_gem_object_flush_if_display(obj);
+	i915_gem_object_flush_if_display_locked(obj);
+
+err:
+	if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
+		ret = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww);
+		if (!ret)
+			goto retry;
+	}
+	i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&ww);
+
+	if (ret)
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
 	return vma;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index 45d79d75e73a..afde1952c119 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ i915_gem_object_last_write_engine(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 void i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 					 unsigned int cache_level);
 void i915_gem_object_flush_if_display(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
+void i915_gem_object_flush_if_display_locked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
 
 int __must_check
 i915_gem_object_set_to_wc_domain(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool write);
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-14 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-14 11:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/23] drm/i915: Revert relocation chaining commits Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/23] drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/23] drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/23] drm/i915: Parse command buffer earlier in eb_relocate(slow) Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/23] drm/i915: Use per object locking in execbuf, v12 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/23] drm/i915: Use ww locking in intel_renderstate Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/23] drm/i915: Add ww context handling to context_barrier_task Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915: Nuke arguments to eb_pin_engine Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/23] drm/i915: Pin engine before pinning all objects, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/23] drm/i915: Rework intel_context pinning to do everything outside of pin_mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/23] drm/i915: Make sure execbuffer always passes ww state to i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/23] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object/client_blt.c to use ww locking as well, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/23] drm/i915: Kill last user of intel_context_create_request outside of selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/23] drm/i915: Convert i915_perf to ww locking as well Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/23] drm/i915: Dirty hack to fix selftests locking inversion Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/23] drm/i915/selftests: Fix locking inversion in lrc selftest Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/23] drm/i915: Use ww pinning for intel_context_create_request() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/23] drm/i915: Move i915_vma_lock in the selftests to avoid lock inversion, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 14:40   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-15 10:49     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Move i915_vma_lock in the selftests to avoid lock inversion, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/23] drm/i915: Add ww locking to vm_fault_gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-14 11:45 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2020-07-14 13:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only" Patchwork
2020-07-14 13:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-07-14 13:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-07-14 15:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only" (rev2) Patchwork
2020-07-14 15:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-07-14 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-07-15 11:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Async GPU relocations only" (rev3) Patchwork
2020-07-15 11:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-07-15 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-07-15 14:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-03 12:21 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/23] drm/i915: Use ww locking in execbuf submission Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-03 12:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/23] drm/i915: Add ww locking to pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200714114516.3073222-23-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox