From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl+: Fix Combo PHY DPLL fractional divider for 38.4MHz ref clock
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 19:10:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200717161039.GX6112@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200714163236.14105-1-imre.deak@intel.com>
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 07:32:36PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Apply Display WA #22010492432 for combo PHY PLLs too. This should fix a
> problem where the PLL output frequency is slightly off with the current
> PLL fractional divider value.
>
> I haven't seen an actual case where this causes a problem, but let's
> follow the spec. It's also needed on some EHL platforms, but for that we
> also need a way to distinguish the affected EHL SKUs, so I leave that
> for a follow-up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index aeb6ee395cce..aee9101f5e7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2887,7 +2887,7 @@ static const struct icl_combo_pll_params icl_dp_combo_pll_24MHz_values[] = {
> };
>
>
> -/* Also used for 38.4 MHz values. */
> +/* On ICL also used for 38.4 MHz values. */
> static const struct icl_combo_pll_params icl_dp_combo_pll_19_2MHz_values[] = {
> { 540000,
> { .dco_integer = 0x1A5, .dco_fraction = 0x7000, /* [0]: 5.4 */
> @@ -2915,6 +2915,37 @@ static const struct icl_combo_pll_params icl_dp_combo_pll_19_2MHz_values[] = {
> .pdiv = 0x1 /* 2 */, .kdiv = 1, .qdiv_mode = 0, .qdiv_ratio = 0, }, },
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Display WA #22010492432: tgl
> + * Divide the nominal .dco_fraction value by 2.
> + */
> +static const struct icl_combo_pll_params tgl_dp_combo_pll_38_4MHz_values[] = {
> + { 540000,
> + { .dco_integer = 0x1A5, .dco_fraction = 0x3800, /* [0]: 5.4 */
> + .pdiv = 0x2 /* 3 */, .kdiv = 1, .qdiv_mode = 0, .qdiv_ratio = 0, }, },
> + { 270000,
> + { .dco_integer = 0x1A5, .dco_fraction = 0x3800, /* [1]: 2.7 */
> + .pdiv = 0x2 /* 3 */, .kdiv = 2, .qdiv_mode = 0, .qdiv_ratio = 0, }, },
> + { 162000,
> + { .dco_integer = 0x1A5, .dco_fraction = 0x3800, /* [2]: 1.62 */
> + .pdiv = 0x4 /* 5 */, .kdiv = 2, .qdiv_mode = 0, .qdiv_ratio = 0, }, },
> + { 324000,
> + { .dco_integer = 0x1A5, .dco_fraction = 0x3800, /* [3]: 3.24 */
> + .pdiv = 0x4 /* 5 */, .kdiv = 1, .qdiv_mode = 0, .qdiv_ratio = 0, }, },
> + { 216000,
> + { .dco_integer = 0x1C2, .dco_fraction = 0x0000, /* [4]: 2.16 */
> + .pdiv = 0x1 /* 2 */, .kdiv = 2, .qdiv_mode = 1, .qdiv_ratio = 2, }, },
> + { 432000,
> + { .dco_integer = 0x1C2, .dco_fraction = 0x0000, /* [5]: 4.32 */
> + .pdiv = 0x1 /* 2 */, .kdiv = 2, .qdiv_mode = 0, .qdiv_ratio = 0, }, },
> + { 648000,
> + { .dco_integer = 0x1FA, .dco_fraction = 0x1000, /* [6]: 6.48 */
> + .pdiv = 0x2 /* 3 */, .kdiv = 1, .qdiv_mode = 0, .qdiv_ratio = 0, }, },
> + { 810000,
> + { .dco_integer = 0x1A5, .dco_fraction = 0x3800, /* [7]: 8.1 */
> + .pdiv = 0x1 /* 2 */, .kdiv = 1, .qdiv_mode = 0, .qdiv_ratio = 0, }, },
> +};
> +
> static const struct skl_wrpll_params icl_tbt_pll_24MHz_values = {
> .dco_integer = 0x151, .dco_fraction = 0x4000,
> .pdiv = 0x4 /* 5 */, .kdiv = 1, .qdiv_mode = 0, .qdiv_ratio = 0,
> @@ -2950,13 +2981,26 @@ static bool icl_calc_dp_combo_pll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> struct skl_wrpll_params *pll_params)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> - const struct icl_combo_pll_params *params =
> - dev_priv->dpll.ref_clks.nssc == 24000 ?
> - icl_dp_combo_pll_24MHz_values :
> - icl_dp_combo_pll_19_2MHz_values;
> + const struct icl_combo_pll_params *params;
> int clock = crtc_state->port_clock;
> int i;
>
> + switch (dev_priv->dpll.ref_clks.nssc) {
> + case 19200:
> + params = icl_dp_combo_pll_19_2MHz_values;
> + break;
> + case 24000:
> + params = icl_dp_combo_pll_24MHz_values;
> + break;
> + case 38400:
> + /* TODO: Apply WA #22010492432 on EHL too. */
> + if (IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv))
> + params = tgl_dp_combo_pll_38_4MHz_values;
> + else
> + params = icl_dp_combo_pll_19_2MHz_values;
> + break;
> + }
Hmm. This only takes care of DP AFAICS. What about HDMI?
Also doesn't readout need some tweaking too?
Should we rather consider pushing this w/a deeper into
the register progamming/readout code?
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(icl_dp_combo_pll_24MHz_values); i++) {
> if (clock == params[i].clock) {
> *pll_params = params[i].wrpll;
> --
> 2.23.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-17 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-14 16:32 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl+: Fix Combo PHY DPLL fractional divider for 38.4MHz ref clock Imre Deak
2020-07-14 19:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-07-15 0:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-07-17 16:10 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-07-17 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Imre Deak
2020-07-17 18:17 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-08-17 18:08 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Imre Deak
2020-08-17 18:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/tgl+: Fix Combo PHY DPLL fractional divider for 38.4MHz ref clock (rev2) Patchwork
2020-08-17 21:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-08-18 14:07 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200717161039.GX6112@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox