Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/modes: Switch to 64bit maths to avoid integer overflow
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:42:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201022194256.30978-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

The new >8k CEA modes have dotclocks reaching 5.94 GHz, which
means our clock*1000 will now overflow the 32bit unsigned
integer. Switch to 64bit maths to avoid it.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
An interesting question how many other place might suffer from similar
overflows. I think i915 should be mostly OK. The one place I know we use
Hz instead kHz is the hsw DPLL code, which I would prefer we also change
to use kHz. The other concern is whether we have any potential overflows
before we check this against the platform's max dotclock.

I do have this unreviewed igt series 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/69531/ which extends the
current testing with some other forms of invalid modes. Could probably
extend that with a mode.clock=INT_MAX test to see if anything else might
trip up.

No idea about other drivers.

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
index 501b4fe55a3d..511cde5c7fa6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
@@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ int drm_mode_vrefresh(const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
 	if (mode->htotal == 0 || mode->vtotal == 0)
 		return 0;
 
-	num = mode->clock * 1000;
+	num = mode->clock;
 	den = mode->htotal * mode->vtotal;
 
 	if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
@@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ int drm_mode_vrefresh(const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
 	if (mode->vscan > 1)
 		den *= mode->vscan;
 
-	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(num, den);
+	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(mul_u32_u32(num, 1000), den);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_vrefresh);
 
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-22 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-22 19:42 Ville Syrjala [this message]
2020-10-22 20:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/modes: Switch to 64bit maths to avoid integer overflow Patchwork
2020-10-22 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-10-23 18:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Randy Dunlap
2020-10-30 14:19 ` Chris Wilson
2020-10-30 14:43   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-11-25 19:44     ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201022194256.30978-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox