From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Decrease number of subplatform bits
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:19:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210121161936.746591-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210121161936.746591-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Commit 6ce1c33d6c36 ("drm/i915: Kill INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_AML") removed the
only platform which used bit 2 so could also decrease the
INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS definition.
This is not a fixes material but still lets make it precise.
v2:
* Fix assert in intel_device_info_subplatform_init by introducing
INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_MASK. (Chris)
* Update intel_subplatform().
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
References: 6ce1c33d6c36 ("drm/i915: Kill INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_AML")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index c31d2776134a..7efb501e22d2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ intel_subplatform(const struct intel_runtime_info *info, enum intel_platform p)
{
const unsigned int pi = __platform_mask_index(info, p);
- return info->platform_mask[pi] & ((1 << INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS) - 1);
+ return info->platform_mask[pi] & INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_MASK;
}
static __always_inline bool
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index 699412c14c1d..7d98a718a051 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ void intel_device_info_subplatform_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
}
}
- GEM_BUG_ON(mask & ~INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(mask & ~INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_MASK);
RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->platform_mask[pi] |= mask;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
index 79dab5a6f272..e6ca1023ffcf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
@@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ enum intel_platform {
* it is fine for the same bit to be used on multiple parent platforms.
*/
-#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS (3)
+#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS (2)
+#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_MASK (BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS) - 1)
/* HSW/BDW/SKL/KBL/CFL */
#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULT (0)
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-21 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-21 16:19 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Check for all subplatform bits Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-21 16:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-01-21 16:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Decrease number of " Chris Wilson
2021-01-22 20:19 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-01-22 0:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Check for all " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210121161936.746591-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox