From: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] i915/perf: Move OA formats to single array
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:40:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210208174029.45621-2-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210208174029.45621-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Variations in OA formats in the different gens has led to creation of
several sparse arrays to store the formats.
Move oa formats into a single array and format_mask to check for
platform specific oa formats.
Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 19 ++-----------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index 7b6aab5f3e46..e7e097ec70e7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static u32 i915_oa_max_sample_rate = 100000;
* code assumes all reports have a power-of-two size and ~(size - 1) can
* be used as a mask to align the OA tail pointer.
*/
-static const struct i915_oa_format hsw_oa_formats[I915_OA_FORMAT_MAX] = {
+static const struct i915_oa_format oa_formats[I915_OA_FORMAT_MAX] = {
[I915_OA_FORMAT_A13] = { 0, 64 },
[I915_OA_FORMAT_A29] = { 1, 128 },
[I915_OA_FORMAT_A13_B8_C8] = { 2, 128 },
@@ -311,17 +311,9 @@ static const struct i915_oa_format hsw_oa_formats[I915_OA_FORMAT_MAX] = {
[I915_OA_FORMAT_A45_B8_C8] = { 5, 256 },
[I915_OA_FORMAT_B4_C8_A16] = { 6, 128 },
[I915_OA_FORMAT_C4_B8] = { 7, 64 },
-};
-
-static const struct i915_oa_format gen8_plus_oa_formats[I915_OA_FORMAT_MAX] = {
[I915_OA_FORMAT_A12] = { 0, 64 },
[I915_OA_FORMAT_A12_B8_C8] = { 2, 128 },
[I915_OA_FORMAT_A32u40_A4u32_B8_C8] = { 5, 256 },
- [I915_OA_FORMAT_C4_B8] = { 7, 64 },
-};
-
-static const struct i915_oa_format gen12_oa_formats[I915_OA_FORMAT_MAX] = {
- [I915_OA_FORMAT_A32u40_A4u32_B8_C8] = { 5, 256 },
};
#define SAMPLE_OA_REPORT (1<<0)
@@ -4333,6 +4325,7 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
/* XXX const struct i915_perf_ops! */
+ perf->oa_formats = oa_formats;
if (IS_HASWELL(i915)) {
perf->ops.is_valid_b_counter_reg = gen7_is_valid_b_counter_addr;
perf->ops.is_valid_mux_reg = hsw_is_valid_mux_addr;
@@ -4343,8 +4336,6 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
perf->ops.oa_disable = gen7_oa_disable;
perf->ops.read = gen7_oa_read;
perf->ops.oa_hw_tail_read = gen7_oa_hw_tail_read;
-
- perf->oa_formats = hsw_oa_formats;
} else if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_CONTEXTS(i915)) {
/* Note: that although we could theoretically also support the
* legacy ringbuffer mode on BDW (and earlier iterations of
@@ -4355,8 +4346,6 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
perf->ops.read = gen8_oa_read;
if (IS_GEN_RANGE(i915, 8, 9)) {
- perf->oa_formats = gen8_plus_oa_formats;
-
perf->ops.is_valid_b_counter_reg =
gen7_is_valid_b_counter_addr;
perf->ops.is_valid_mux_reg =
@@ -4387,8 +4376,6 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
perf->gen8_valid_ctx_bit = BIT(16);
}
} else if (IS_GEN_RANGE(i915, 10, 11)) {
- perf->oa_formats = gen8_plus_oa_formats;
-
perf->ops.is_valid_b_counter_reg =
gen7_is_valid_b_counter_addr;
perf->ops.is_valid_mux_reg =
@@ -4411,8 +4398,6 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
}
perf->gen8_valid_ctx_bit = BIT(16);
} else if (IS_GEN(i915, 12)) {
- perf->oa_formats = gen12_oa_formats;
-
perf->ops.is_valid_b_counter_reg =
gen12_is_valid_b_counter_addr;
perf->ops.is_valid_mux_reg =
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 17:40 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] i915/perf: Store a mask of valid OA formats for a platform Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-02-08 17:40 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa [this message]
2021-02-08 17:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] i915/perf: Add additional OA formats for gen12 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-02-08 20:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/3] i915/perf: Store a mask of valid OA formats for a platform Patchwork
2021-02-08 20:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-02-09 0:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-02 7:54 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-02-02 7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] i915/perf: Move OA formats to single array Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210208174029.45621-2-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--to=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=chris.p.wilson@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox