From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/display: remove strap checks from gen 9
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:36:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210319173603.521779-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210319173603.521779-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Direction on gen9+ was to stop reading the straps and only rely on the
VBT for marking the port presence. This happened while dealing with
WaIgnoreDDIAStrap and instead of using it as a WA, it should now be the
normal flow. See commit 885d3e5b6f08 ("drm/i915/display: fix comment on
skl straps").
For gen 10 it's hard to say if this will work or not since I can't test
it, so leave it with the same behavior as before.
For PCH_TGP we should still rely on the VBT to make ports E and F not
available.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 36 ++++++--------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 82471961e721..b9af1f1e347e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -11687,34 +11687,25 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
vlv_dsi_init(dev_priv);
+ } else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 9)) {
+ intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
+ intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
+ intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
+ intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
+ intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
+ intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
} else if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
- int found;
+ u32 found;
if (intel_ddi_crt_present(dev_priv))
intel_crt_init(dev_priv);
- /*
- * Haswell uses DDI functions to detect digital outputs.
- * On SKL pre-D0 the strap isn't connected. Later SKUs may or
- * may not have it - it was supposed to be fixed by the same
- * time we stopped using straps. Assume it's there.
- */
+ /* Haswell uses DDI functions to detect digital outputs. */
found = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_A)) & DDI_INIT_DISPLAY_DETECTED;
- /* WaIgnoreDDIAStrap: skl */
- if (found || IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
+ if (found)
intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
- /* DDI B, C, D, and F detection is indicated by the SFUSE_STRAP
- * register */
- if (HAS_PCH_TGP(dev_priv)) {
- /* W/A due to lack of STRAP config on TGP PCH*/
- found = (SFUSE_STRAP_DDIB_DETECTED |
- SFUSE_STRAP_DDIC_DETECTED |
- SFUSE_STRAP_DDID_DETECTED);
- } else {
- found = intel_de_read(dev_priv, SFUSE_STRAP);
- }
-
+ found = intel_de_read(dev_priv, SFUSE_STRAP);
if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIB_DETECTED)
intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIC_DETECTED)
@@ -11723,11 +11714,6 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIF_DETECTED)
intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
- /*
- * On SKL we don't have a way to detect DDI-E so we rely on VBT.
- */
- if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
- intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
} else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv)) {
int found;
--
2.30.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-19 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-19 17:36 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/3] Simplify intel_setup_outputs() Lucas De Marchi
2021-03-19 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/display: move vbt check to intel_ddi_init() Lucas De Marchi
2021-03-19 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/display: remove FIXME comment for intended feature Lucas De Marchi
2021-03-23 10:14 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-19 17:36 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2021-04-07 16:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/display: remove strap checks from gen 9 Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-03-19 18:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Simplify intel_setup_outputs() (rev2) Patchwork
2021-03-19 18:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-03-19 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-23 22:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Simplify intel_setup_outputs() (rev3) Patchwork
2021-03-23 23:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-03-24 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-24 18:00 ` Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210319173603.521779-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox