Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Handle async cancellation in sentinel assert
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:13:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210324121335.2307063-5-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210324121335.2307063-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

With the watchdog cancelling requests asynchronously to preempt-to-busy we
need to relax one assert making it apply only to requests not in error.

v2:
 * Check against the correct request!

v3:
 * Simplify the check to avoid the question of when to sample the fence
   error vs sentinel bit.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
index 4b870eca9693..9d264d4ffa75 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
@@ -700,9 +700,8 @@ assert_pending_valid(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
 {
 	struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
 		container_of(execlists, typeof(*engine), execlists);
-	struct i915_request * const *port, *rq;
+	struct i915_request * const *port, *rq, *prev = NULL;
 	struct intel_context *ce = NULL;
-	bool sentinel = false;
 	u32 ccid = -1;
 
 	trace_ports(execlists, msg, execlists->pending);
@@ -752,15 +751,20 @@ assert_pending_valid(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
 		 * Sentinels are supposed to be the last request so they flush
 		 * the current execution off the HW. Check that they are the only
 		 * request in the pending submission.
+		 *
+		 * NB: Due to the async nature of preempt-to-busy and request
+		 * cancellation we need to handle the case where request
+		 * becomes a sentinel in parallel to CSB processing.
 		 */
-		if (sentinel) {
+		if (prev && i915_request_has_sentinel(prev) &&
+		    !READ_ONCE(prev->fence.error)) {
 			GEM_TRACE_ERR("%s: context:%llx after sentinel in pending[%zd]\n",
 				      engine->name,
 				      ce->timeline->fence_context,
 				      port - execlists->pending);
 			return false;
 		}
-		sentinel = i915_request_has_sentinel(rq);
+		prev = rq;
 
 		/*
 		 * We want virtual requests to only be in the first slot so
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-24 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-24 12:13 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/7] Default request/fence expiry + watchdog Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-24 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Extract active lookup engine to a helper Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-24 12:21   ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-24 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Individual request cancellation Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-24 15:24   ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-24 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Restrict sentinel requests further Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-24 15:25   ` Matthew Auld
2021-03-26  0:01     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 12:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-03-24 17:22   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Handle async cancellation in sentinel assert Matthew Auld
2021-03-24 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Request watchdog infrastructure Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-26  0:00   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-26 10:32     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-24 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Fail too long user submissions by default Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-24 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Allow configuring default request expiry via modparam Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-26  0:25   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 13:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Default request/fence expiry + watchdog (rev5) Patchwork
2021-03-24 13:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-24 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-03-24 23:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-26  9:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/7] Default request/fence expiry + watchdog Daniel Vetter
2021-03-26 10:31   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-08 10:18     ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210324121335.2307063-5-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox