From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: carl.zhang@intel.com, jason.ekstrand@intel.com, daniel.vetter@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 1/5] drm/doc/rfc: i915 GuC submission / DRM scheduler integration plan
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 10:30:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210506173049.72503-2-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210506173049.72503-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Add entry for i915 GuC submission / DRM scheduler integration plan.
Follow up patch with details of new parallel submission uAPI to come.
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst | 4 ++
2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fa6780a11c86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+=========================================
+I915 GuC Submission/DRM Scheduler Section
+=========================================
+
+Upstream plan
+=============
+For upstream the overall plan for landing GuC submission and integrating the
+i915 with the DRM scheduler is:
+
+* Merge basic GuC submission
+ * Basic submission support for all gen11+ platforms
+ * Not enabled by default on any current platforms but can be enabled via
+ modparam enable_guc
+ * Lots of rework will need to be done to integrate with DRM scheduler so
+ no need to nit pick everything in the code, it just should be
+ functional and not regress execlists
+ * Update IGTs / selftests as needed to work with GuC submission
+ * Enable CI on supported platforms for a baseline
+ * Rework / get CI heathly for GuC submission in place as needed
+* Merge new parallel submission uAPI
+ * Bonding uAPI completely incompatible with GuC submission
+ * New uAPI adds I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_PARALLEL context setup step
+ which configures contexts N wide
+ * After I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_PARALLEL a user can submit N batches to
+ a context in a single execbuf IOCTL and the batches run on the GPU in
+ paralllel
+ * Initially only for GuC submission but execlists can be supported if
+ needed
+* Convert the i915 to use the DRM scheduler
+ * GuC submission backend fully integrated with DRM scheduler
+ * All request queues removed from backend (e.g. all backpressure
+ handled in DRM scheduler)
+ * Resets / cancels hook in DRM scheduler
+ * Watchdog hooks into DRM scheduler
+ * Lots of complexity of the GuC backend can be pulled out once
+ integrated with DRM scheduler (e.g. state machine gets
+ simplier, locking gets simplier, etc...)
+ * Execlist backend will do the minimum required to hook in the DRM
+ scheduler so it can live next to the fully integrated GuC backend
+ * Legacy interface
+ * Features like timeslicing / preemption / virtual engines would
+ be difficult to integrate with the DRM scheduler and these
+ features are not required for GuC submission as the GuC does
+ these things for us
+ * ROI low on fully integrating into DRM scheduler
+ * Fully integrating would add lots of complexity to DRM
+ scheduler
+ * Port i915 priority inheritance / boosting feature in DRM scheduler
+ * Remove in-order completion assumptions from DRM scheduler
+ * Pull out i915 priority levels and use DRM priority levels
+ * Optimize DRM scheduler as needed
+
+New uAPI for basic GuC submission
+=================================
+No major changes are required to the uAPI for basic GuC submission. The only
+change is a new scheduler attribute: I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_STATIC_PRIORITY_MAP.
+This attribute indicates the 2k i915 user priority levels are statically mapped
+into 3 levels as follows:
+
+* -1k to -1 Low priority
+* 0 Medium priority
+* 1 to 1k High priority
+
+This is needed because the GuC only has 4 priority bands. The highest priority
+band is reserved with the kernel. This aligns with the DRM scheduler priority
+levels too.
+
+New parallel submission uAPI
+============================
+Details to come in a following patch.
diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
index a8621f7dab8b..018a8bf317a6 100644
--- a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
@@ -15,3 +15,7 @@ host such documentation:
* Once the code has landed move all the documentation to the right places in
the main core, helper or driver sections.
+
+.. toctree::
+
+ i915_scheduler.rst
--
2.28.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-06 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 17:30 [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/5] GuC submission / DRM scheduler integration plan + new uAPI Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 17:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
2021-05-06 17:30 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-05-11 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 1/5] drm/doc/rfc: i915 GuC submission / DRM scheduler integration plan Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 14:58 ` Daniel Stone
2021-05-11 15:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 2/5] drm/doc/rfc: i915 new parallel submission uAPI plan Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 14:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:51 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Expose logical engine instance to user Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 14:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Introduce 'set parallel submit' extension Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 18:44 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-12 8:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-14 20:05 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-17 13:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-17 17:46 ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Update execbuf IOCTL to accept N BBs Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 18:01 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210506173049.72503-2-matthew.brost@intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=carl.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jason.ekstrand@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox