From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915/selftests: Replace an unbounded set-domain wait with a timeout
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 15:14:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210526141456.2334192-11-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210526141456.2334192-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
After the memory-region test completes, it flushes the test by calling
set-to-cpu-domain. Use the igt_flush_test as it includes a timeout,
recovery and reports and error for miscreant tests.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
index f85fd8cbfbf5..7a3f71e83140 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
@@ -826,11 +826,10 @@ static int igt_lmem_write_cpu(void *arg)
if (err)
goto out_unpin;
- i915_gem_object_lock(obj, NULL);
- err = i915_gem_object_set_to_wc_domain(obj, true);
- i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
- if (err)
+ if (igt_flush_test(engine->i915)) {
+ err = -EIO;
goto out_unpin;
+ }
count = ARRAY_SIZE(bytes);
order = i915_random_order(count * count, &prng);
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-26 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-26 14:14 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] Catchup with a few dropped patches Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: Take rcu_read_lock for querying fence's driver/timeline names Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 10:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-26 14:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915: Remove notion of GEM from i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915: Lift marking a lock as used to utils Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Wrap cmpxchg64 with try_cmpxchg64() helper Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915/selftests: Set cache status for huge_gem_object Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915/selftests: Use a coherent map to setup scratch batch buffers Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/selftests: Replace the unbounded set-domain with an explicit wait Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915/selftests: Remove redundant set-to-gtt-domain Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915/selftests: Replace unbound set-domain waits with explicit timeouts Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-05-26 14:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915/selftests: Remove redundant set-to-gtt-domain before batch submission Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/gem: Manage all set-domain waits explicitly Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 14:30 ` Matthew Auld
2021-05-26 14:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 10:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Daniel Vetter
2021-05-26 20:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Catchup with a few dropped patches (rev2) Patchwork
2021-05-26 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-05-26 21:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210526141456.2334192-11-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox