Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Fix -EDEADLK handling regression
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:44:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210630164413.25481-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

The conversion to ww mutexes failed to address the fence code which
already returns -EDEADLK when we run out of fences. Ww mutexes on
the other hand treat -EDEADLK as an internal errno value indicating
a need to restart the operation due to a deadlock. So now when the
fence code returns -EDEADLK the higher level code erroneously
restarts everything instead of returning the error to userspace
as is expected.

To remedy this let's switch the fence code to use a different errno
value for this. -ENOBUFS seems like a semi-reasonable unique choice.
Apart from igt the only user of this I could find is sna, and even
there all we do is dump the current fence registers from debugfs
into the X server log. So no user visible functionality is affected.
If we really cared about preserving this we could of course convert
back to -EDEADLK higher up, but doesn't seem like that's worth
the hassle here.

Not quite sure which commit specifically broke this, but I'll
just attribute it to the general gem ww mutex work.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Testcase: igt/gem_pread/exhaustion
Testcase: igt/gem_pwrite/basic-exhaustion
Testcase: igt/gem_fenced_exec_thrash/too-many-fences
Fixes: 80f0b679d6f0 ("drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2.")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c
index cac7f3f44642..f8948de72036 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static struct i915_fence_reg *fence_find(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 	if (intel_has_pending_fb_unpin(ggtt->vm.i915))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
 
-	return ERR_PTR(-EDEADLK);
+	return ERR_PTR(-ENOBUFS);
 }
 
 int __i915_vma_pin_fence(struct i915_vma *vma)
-- 
2.31.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-30 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-30 16:44 Ville Syrjala [this message]
2021-06-30 19:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/gt: Fix -EDEADLK handling regression Patchwork
2021-07-01  2:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-01  7:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-07-01 17:00   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-07-13 19:58   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13 19:59     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13 20:19       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-13 20:22       ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210630164413.25481-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox