From: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display/dg1: Correctly map DPLLs during state readout
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:05:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210630210522.162674-1-jose.souza@intel.com> (raw)
_DG1_DPCLKA0_CFGCR0 maps between DPLL 0 and 1 with one bit for phy A
and B while _DG1_DPCLKA1_CFGCR0 maps between DPLL 2 and 3 with one
bit for phy C and D.
Reusing _cnl_ddi_get_pll() don't take that into cosideration returing
DPLL 0 and 1 for phy C and D.
That is a regression introduced in the refactor done in commit
c9fdceaa64dc ("drm/i915: Move DDI clock readout to encoder->get_config()").
While at it also dropping the macros previously used, not reusing it
to improve readability.
BSpec: 50286
Fixes: c9fdceaa64dc ("drm/i915: Move DDI clock readout to encoder->get_config()")
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 ---
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
index 91fd85bee1d27..26a3aa73fcc43 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
@@ -1738,10 +1738,23 @@ static struct intel_shared_dpll *dg1_ddi_get_pll(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(i915, encoder->port);
+ enum intel_dpll_id id;
+ u32 val;
- return _cnl_ddi_get_pll(i915, DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0(phy),
- DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy),
- DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy));
+ val = intel_de_read(i915, DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0(phy));
+ val &= DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy);
+ val >>= DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy);
+ id = val;
+
+ /*
+ * _DG1_DPCLKA0_CFGCR0 maps between DPLL 0 and 1 with one bit for phy A
+ * and B while _DG1_DPCLKA1_CFGCR0 maps between DPLL 2 and 3 with one
+ * bit for phy C and D.
+ */
+ if (phy >= PHY_C)
+ id += DPLL_ID_DG1_DPLL2;
+
+ return intel_get_shared_dpll_by_id(i915, id);
}
static void icl_ddi_combo_enable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 65c155b141899..16a19239d86dd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -10525,7 +10525,6 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
#define _DG1_DPCLKA1_CFGCR0 0x16C280
#define _DG1_DPCLKA_PHY_IDX(phy) ((phy) % 2)
#define _DG1_DPCLKA_PLL_IDX(pll) ((pll) % 2)
-#define _DG1_PHY_DPLL_MAP(phy) ((phy) >= PHY_C ? DPLL_ID_DG1_DPLL2 : DPLL_ID_DG1_DPLL0)
#define DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0(phy) _MMIO_PHY((phy) / 2, \
_DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0, \
_DG1_DPCLKA1_CFGCR0)
@@ -10533,8 +10532,6 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
#define DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy) (_DG1_DPCLKA_PHY_IDX(phy) * 2)
#define DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL(pll, phy) (_DG1_DPCLKA_PLL_IDX(pll) << DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy))
#define DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy) (0x3 << DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy))
-#define DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_DPLL_MAP(clk_sel, phy) \
- (((clk_sel) >> DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy)) + _DG1_PHY_DPLL_MAP(phy))
/* ADLS Clocks */
#define _ADLS_DPCLKA_CFGCR0 0x164280
--
2.32.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-30 21:05 José Roberto de Souza [this message]
2021-06-30 21:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display/dg1: Correctly map DPLLs during state readout Patchwork
2021-06-30 21:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-06-30 22:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-01 5:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
2021-07-01 17:19 ` Souza, Jose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210630210522.162674-1-jose.souza@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox