From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/fbc: Implement Wa_16011863758 for icl+
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 23:46:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210702204603.596-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210702204603.596-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
There's some kind of weird corner cases in FBC which requires
FBC segments to be separated by at least one extra cacheline.
Make sure that is present.
TODO: the formula laid out in the spec seem to be semi-nonsense
so this is mostly my interpretation on what it is actually trying
to say. Need to wait for clarification from the hw folks to know
for sure.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
index 2da5295092e7..daf2191dd3f6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
@@ -88,6 +88,16 @@ static unsigned int intel_fbc_cfb_stride(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
{
unsigned int stride = _intel_fbc_cfb_stride(cache);
+ /*
+ * Wa_16011863758: icl+
+ * CFB segment stride needs at least one extra cacheline.
+ * We make sure each line has an extra cacheline so that
+ * the 4 line segment will have one regarless of the
+ * compression limit we choose later.
+ */
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11)
+ stride = max(stride, cache->plane.src_w * 4 + 64u);
+
/*
* At least some of the platforms require each 4 line segment to
* be 512 byte aligned. Aligning each line to 512 bytes guarantees
--
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-02 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-02 20:45 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915/fbc: Rework CFB stride/size calculations Ville Syrjala
2021-07-02 20:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/fbc: Rewrite the FBC tiling check a bit Ville Syrjala
2021-07-02 20:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/fbc: Extract intel_fbc_update() Ville Syrjala
2021-07-02 20:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/fbc: Move the "recompress on activate" to a central place Ville Syrjala
2021-07-02 20:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/fbc: Polish the skl+ FBC stride override handling Ville Syrjala
2021-07-05 8:02 ` Jani Nikula
2021-07-02 20:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/fbc: Rework cfb stride/size calculations Ville Syrjala
2021-09-06 5:23 ` Shankar, Uma
2021-09-21 14:56 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-09-22 18:09 ` Shankar, Uma
2021-07-02 20:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/fbc: Align FBC segments to 512B on glk+ Ville Syrjala
2021-08-19 10:50 ` Juha-Pekka Heikkila
2021-07-02 20:46 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2021-08-19 10:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/fbc: Implement Wa_16011863758 for icl+ Juha-Pekka Heikkila
2021-07-02 20:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/fbc: Allow higher compression limits on FBC1 Ville Syrjala
2021-08-23 17:52 ` Juha-Pekka Heikkilä
2021-07-02 22:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/fbc: Rework CFB stride/size calculations Patchwork
2021-07-02 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-03 1:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-07 15:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/fbc: Rework CFB stride/size calculations (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-07 15:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-07 20:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210702204603.596-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox