From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 01/12] drm/i915/step: s/<platform>_revid_tbl/<platform>_revids
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:36:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210713193635.3390052-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713193635.3390052-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
From: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Simplify the stepping info array name.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
index ba9479a67521..93ccd42f2514 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static const struct intel_step_info kbl_revids[] = {
[7] = { .gt_step = STEP_G0, .display_step = STEP_C0 },
};
-static const struct intel_step_info tgl_uy_revid_step_tbl[] = {
+static const struct intel_step_info tgl_uy_revids[] = {
[0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 },
[1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_C0 },
[2] = { .gt_step = STEP_B1, .display_step = STEP_C0 },
@@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ static const struct intel_step_info tgl_uy_revid_step_tbl[] = {
};
/* Same GT stepping between tgl_uy_revids and tgl_revids don't mean the same HW */
-static const struct intel_step_info tgl_revid_step_tbl[] = {
+static const struct intel_step_info tgl_revids[] = {
[0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_B0 },
[1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_D0 },
};
-static const struct intel_step_info adls_revid_step_tbl[] = {
+static const struct intel_step_info adls_revids[] = {
[0x0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 },
[0x1] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A2 },
[0x4] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 },
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static const struct intel_step_info adls_revid_step_tbl[] = {
[0xC] = { .gt_step = STEP_D0, .display_step = STEP_C0 },
};
-static const struct intel_step_info adlp_revid_step_tbl[] = {
+static const struct intel_step_info adlp_revids[] = {
[0x0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 },
[0x4] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 },
[0x8] = { .gt_step = STEP_C0, .display_step = STEP_C0 },
@@ -62,17 +62,17 @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
struct intel_step_info step = {};
if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915)) {
- revids = adlp_revid_step_tbl;
- size = ARRAY_SIZE(adlp_revid_step_tbl);
+ revids = adlp_revids;
+ size = ARRAY_SIZE(adlp_revids);
} else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_S(i915)) {
- revids = adls_revid_step_tbl;
- size = ARRAY_SIZE(adls_revid_step_tbl);
+ revids = adls_revids;
+ size = ARRAY_SIZE(adls_revids);
} else if (IS_TGL_U(i915) || IS_TGL_Y(i915)) {
- revids = tgl_uy_revid_step_tbl;
- size = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_uy_revid_step_tbl);
+ revids = tgl_uy_revids;
+ size = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_uy_revids);
} else if (IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) {
- revids = tgl_revid_step_tbl;
- size = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_revid_step_tbl);
+ revids = tgl_revids;
+ size = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_revids);
} else if (IS_KABYLAKE(i915)) {
revids = kbl_revids;
size = ARRAY_SIZE(kbl_revids);
--
2.25.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-13 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-13 19:36 [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 00/12] Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:36 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2021-07-13 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 02/12] drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 03/12] drm/i915/skl: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-13 20:03 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-13 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 04/12] drm/i915/kbl: Drop pre-production revision from stepping table Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 05/12] drm/i915/bxt: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 06/12] drm/i915/glk: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 07/12] drm/i915/icl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 08/12] drm/i915/jsl_ehl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 09/12] drm/i915/rkl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 10/12] drm/i915/dg1: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 11/12] drm/i915/cnl: Drop all workarounds Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI v4 12/12] drm/i915/icl: Drop workarounds that only apply to pre-production steppings Matt Roper
2021-07-13 22:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup (rev5) Patchwork
2021-07-13 22:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-14 8:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-15 1:10 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210713193635.3390052-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox