From: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Lionel G Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>,
Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>,
daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/gt: Check for conflicting RING_NONPRIV
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 13:13:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210803201349.31031-4-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210803201349.31031-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Strip the encoded bits from the register offset so that we only use the
address for looking up the RING_NONPRIV entry.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 66 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
index 94540cdb90c4..7dda5a0a8e75 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
@@ -80,18 +80,44 @@ static void wa_init_finish(struct i915_wa_list *wal)
wal->wa_count, wal->name, wal->engine_name);
}
+static u32 reg_offset(i915_reg_t reg)
+{
+ return i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg) & RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_ADDRESS_MASK;
+}
+
+static u32 reg_flags(i915_reg_t reg)
+{
+ return i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg) & ~RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_ADDRESS_MASK;
+}
+
+__maybe_unused
+static bool is_nonpriv_flags_valid(u32 flags)
+{
+ /* Check only valid flag bits are set */
+ if (flags & ~RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_MASK_VALID)
+ return false;
+
+ /* NB: Only 3 out of 4 enum values are valid for access field */
+ if ((flags & RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_ACCESS_MASK) ==
+ RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_ACCESS_INVALID)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static int wa_index(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg)
{
- unsigned int addr = i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg);
int start = 0, end = wal->count;
+ u32 addr = reg_offset(reg);
/* addr and wal->list[].reg, both include the R/W flags */
while (start < end) {
unsigned int mid = start + (end - start) / 2;
+ u32 pos = reg_offset(wal->list[mid].reg);
- if (i915_mmio_reg_offset(wal->list[mid].reg) < addr)
+ if (pos < addr)
start = mid + 1;
- else if (i915_mmio_reg_offset(wal->list[mid].reg) > addr)
+ else if (pos > addr)
end = mid;
else
return mid;
@@ -117,13 +143,22 @@ static void __wa_add(struct i915_wa_list *wal, const struct i915_wa *wa)
struct i915_wa *wa_;
int index;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!is_nonpriv_flags_valid(reg_flags(wa->reg)));
+
index = wa_index(wal, wa->reg);
if (index >= 0) {
wa_ = &wal->list[index];
+ if (i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa->reg) !=
+ i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa_->reg)) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Discarding incompatible w/a for reg %04x\n",
+ reg_offset(wa->reg));
+ return;
+ }
+
if ((wa->clr | wa_->clr) && !(wa->clr & ~wa_->clr)) {
DRM_ERROR("Discarding overwritten w/a for reg %04x (clear: %08x, set: %08x)\n",
- i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa_->reg),
+ reg_offset(wa_->reg),
wa_->clr, wa_->set);
wa_->set &= ~wa->clr;
@@ -141,10 +176,8 @@ static void __wa_add(struct i915_wa_list *wal, const struct i915_wa *wa)
*wa_ = *wa;
while (wa_-- > wal->list) {
- GEM_BUG_ON(i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa_[0].reg) ==
- i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa_[1].reg));
- if (i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa_[1].reg) >
- i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa_[0].reg))
+ GEM_BUG_ON(reg_offset(wa_[0].reg) == reg_offset(wa_[1].reg));
+ if (reg_offset(wa_[1].reg) > reg_offset(wa_[0].reg))
break;
swap(wa_[1], wa_[0]);
@@ -160,7 +193,7 @@ static void _wa_add(struct i915_wa_list *wal, const struct i915_wa *wa)
if (IS_ALIGNED(wal->count, grow) && /* Either uninitialized or full. */
wa_list_grow(wal, ALIGN(wal->count + 1, grow), GFP_KERNEL)) {
DRM_ERROR("Unable to store w/a for reg %04x\n",
- i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa->reg));
+ reg_offset(wa->reg));
return;
}
@@ -1227,21 +1260,6 @@ bool intel_gt_verify_workarounds(struct intel_gt *gt, const char *from)
return wa_list_verify(gt, >->i915->gt_wa_list, from);
}
-__maybe_unused
-static bool is_nonpriv_flags_valid(u32 flags)
-{
- /* Check only valid flag bits are set */
- if (flags & ~RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_MASK_VALID)
- return false;
-
- /* NB: Only 3 out of 4 enum values are valid for access field */
- if ((flags & RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_ACCESS_MASK) ==
- RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_ACCESS_INVALID)
- return false;
-
- return true;
-}
-
static void
whitelist_reg_ext(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 flags)
{
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-03 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-03 20:13 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Enable triggered perf query for Xe_HP Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/gt: Lock intel_engine_apply_whitelist with uncore->lock Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/gt: Refactor _wa_add to reuse wa_index and wa_list_grow Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:13 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa [this message]
2021-08-03 20:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/gt: Enable dynamic adjustment of RING_NONPRIV Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/perf: Ensure observation logic is not clock gated Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/perf: Whitelist OA report trigger registers Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/perf: Whitelist OA counter and buffer registers Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/perf: Map OA buffer to user space for gen12 performance query Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Enable triggered perf query for Xe_HP Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:27 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 21:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for " Patchwork
2021-08-03 21:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-08-30 19:38 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-30 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/gt: Check for conflicting RING_NONPRIV Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-31 3:39 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-17 11:01 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/gt: Lock intel_engine_apply_whitelist with uncore->lock Chris Wilson
2020-11-17 11:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/gt: Check for conflicting RING_NONPRIV Chris Wilson
2020-11-17 18:08 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210803201349.31031-4-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--to=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox