From: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/25] drm/i915/uncore: constify the register vtables.
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 13:17:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210910031741.3292388-3-airlied@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210910031741.3292388-1-airlied@gmail.com>
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This reworks the uncore function vtable so that it's constant.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h | 8 +-
2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 2dac69d92c1b..94bcc0a8dbeb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1762,32 +1762,24 @@ __vgpu_write(8)
__vgpu_write(16)
__vgpu_write(32)
-#define ASSIGN_RAW_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, x) \
-do { \
- (uncore)->funcs.mmio_writeb = x##_write8; \
- (uncore)->funcs.mmio_writew = x##_write16; \
- (uncore)->funcs.mmio_writel = x##_write32; \
-} while (0)
-
-#define ASSIGN_RAW_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, x) \
-do { \
- (uncore)->funcs.mmio_readb = x##_read8; \
- (uncore)->funcs.mmio_readw = x##_read16; \
- (uncore)->funcs.mmio_readl = x##_read32; \
- (uncore)->funcs.mmio_readq = x##_read64; \
-} while (0)
-
-#define ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, x) \
-do { \
- ASSIGN_RAW_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS((uncore), x); \
- (uncore)->funcs.write_fw_domains = x##_reg_write_fw_domains; \
-} while (0)
-
-#define ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, x) \
-do { \
- ASSIGN_RAW_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, x); \
- (uncore)->funcs.read_fw_domains = x##_reg_read_fw_domains; \
-} while (0)
+#define MMIO_RAW_WRITE_VFUNCS(x) \
+ .mmio_writeb = x##_write8, \
+ .mmio_writew = x##_write16, \
+ .mmio_writel = x##_write32
+
+#define MMIO_RAW_READ_VFUNCS(x) \
+ .mmio_readb = x##_read8, \
+ .mmio_readw = x##_read16, \
+ .mmio_readl = x##_read32, \
+ .mmio_readq = x##_read64
+
+#define MMIO_WRITE_FW_VFUNCS(x) \
+ MMIO_RAW_WRITE_VFUNCS(x), \
+ .write_fw_domains = x##_reg_write_fw_domains
+
+#define MMIO_READ_FW_VFUNCS(x) \
+ MMIO_RAW_READ_VFUNCS(x), \
+ .read_fw_domains = x##_reg_read_fw_domains
static int __fw_domain_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
enum forcewake_domain_id domain_id,
@@ -2092,22 +2084,70 @@ void intel_uncore_init_early(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
uncore->debug = &i915->mmio_debug;
}
+static const struct intel_uncore_funcs vgpu_funcs = {
+ MMIO_RAW_WRITE_VFUNCS(vgpu),
+ MMIO_RAW_READ_VFUNCS(vgpu),
+};
+
+static const struct intel_uncore_funcs gen5_funcs = {
+ MMIO_RAW_WRITE_VFUNCS(gen5),
+ MMIO_RAW_READ_VFUNCS(gen5),
+};
+
+static const struct intel_uncore_funcs gen2_funcs = {
+ MMIO_RAW_WRITE_VFUNCS(gen2),
+ MMIO_RAW_READ_VFUNCS(gen2),
+};
+
+
static void uncore_raw_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uncore_has_forcewake(uncore));
if (intel_vgpu_active(uncore->i915)) {
- ASSIGN_RAW_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, vgpu);
- ASSIGN_RAW_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, vgpu);
+ uncore->funcs = &vgpu_funcs;
} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(uncore->i915) == 5) {
- ASSIGN_RAW_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen5);
- ASSIGN_RAW_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen5);
+ uncore->funcs = &gen5_funcs;
} else {
- ASSIGN_RAW_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen2);
- ASSIGN_RAW_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen2);
+ uncore->funcs = &gen2_funcs;
}
}
+static const struct intel_uncore_funcs xehp_funcs = {
+ MMIO_WRITE_FW_VFUNCS(xehp_fwtable),
+ MMIO_READ_FW_VFUNCS(gen11_fwtable)
+};
+
+static const struct intel_uncore_funcs gen12_funcs = {
+ MMIO_WRITE_FW_VFUNCS(gen12_fwtable),
+ MMIO_READ_FW_VFUNCS(gen12_fwtable)
+};
+
+static const struct intel_uncore_funcs gen11_funcs = {
+ MMIO_WRITE_FW_VFUNCS(gen11_fwtable),
+ MMIO_READ_FW_VFUNCS(gen11_fwtable)
+};
+
+static const struct intel_uncore_funcs fwtable_funcs = {
+ MMIO_WRITE_FW_VFUNCS(fwtable),
+ MMIO_READ_FW_VFUNCS(fwtable)
+};
+
+static const struct intel_uncore_funcs gen8_funcs = {
+ MMIO_WRITE_FW_VFUNCS(gen8),
+ MMIO_READ_FW_VFUNCS(gen6)
+};
+
+static const struct intel_uncore_funcs vlv_funcs = {
+ MMIO_WRITE_FW_VFUNCS(gen6),
+ MMIO_READ_FW_VFUNCS(fwtable)
+};
+
+static const struct intel_uncore_funcs gen6_funcs = {
+ MMIO_WRITE_FW_VFUNCS(gen6),
+ MMIO_READ_FW_VFUNCS(gen6)
+};
+
static int uncore_forcewake_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = uncore->i915;
@@ -2122,38 +2162,29 @@ static int uncore_forcewake_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 55)) {
ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __dg2_fw_ranges);
- ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, xehp_fwtable);
- ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
+ uncore->funcs = &xehp_funcs;
} else if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50)) {
ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __xehp_fw_ranges);
- ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, xehp_fwtable);
- ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
+ uncore->funcs = &xehp_funcs;
} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12) {
ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen12_fw_ranges);
- ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
- ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
+ uncore->funcs = &gen12_funcs;
} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 11) {
ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen11_fw_ranges);
- ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
- ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
+ uncore->funcs = &gen11_funcs;
} else if (IS_GRAPHICS_VER(i915, 9, 10)) {
ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen9_fw_ranges);
- ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
- ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
+ uncore->funcs = &fwtable_funcs;
} else if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915)) {
ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __chv_fw_ranges);
- ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
- ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
+ uncore->funcs = &fwtable_funcs;
} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 8) {
- ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen8);
- ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen6);
+ uncore->funcs = &gen8_funcs;
} else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915)) {
ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __vlv_fw_ranges);
- ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen6);
- ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
+ uncore->funcs = &vlv_funcs;
} else if (IS_GRAPHICS_VER(i915, 6, 7)) {
- ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen6);
- ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen6);
+ uncore->funcs = &gen6_funcs;
}
uncore->pmic_bus_access_nb.notifier_call = i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier;
@@ -2196,8 +2227,8 @@ int intel_uncore_init_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
/* make sure fw funcs are set if and only if we have fw*/
GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uncore_has_forcewake(uncore) != !!uncore->fw_get_funcs);
- GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uncore_has_forcewake(uncore) != !!uncore->funcs.read_fw_domains);
- GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uncore_has_forcewake(uncore) != !!uncore->funcs.write_fw_domains);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uncore_has_forcewake(uncore) != !!uncore->funcs->read_fw_domains);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uncore_has_forcewake(uncore) != !!uncore->funcs->write_fw_domains);
if (HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED(i915))
uncore->flags |= UNCORE_HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED;
@@ -2536,10 +2567,10 @@ intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
return 0;
if (op & FW_REG_READ)
- fw_domains = uncore->funcs.read_fw_domains(uncore, reg);
+ fw_domains = uncore->funcs->read_fw_domains(uncore, reg);
if (op & FW_REG_WRITE)
- fw_domains |= uncore->funcs.write_fw_domains(uncore, reg);
+ fw_domains |= uncore->funcs->write_fw_domains(uncore, reg);
drm_WARN_ON(&uncore->i915->drm, fw_domains & ~uncore->fw_domains);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
index 1a7448f5f16f..52d4baf07656 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ struct intel_uncore {
struct notifier_block pmic_bus_access_nb;
const struct intel_uncore_fw_get *fw_get_funcs;
- struct intel_uncore_funcs funcs;
+ const struct intel_uncore_funcs *funcs;
unsigned int fifo_count;
@@ -312,14 +312,14 @@ __raw_write(64, q)
static inline u##x__ intel_uncore_##name__(struct intel_uncore *uncore, \
i915_reg_t reg) \
{ \
- return uncore->funcs.mmio_read##s__(uncore, reg, (trace__)); \
+ return uncore->funcs->mmio_read##s__(uncore, reg, (trace__)); \
}
#define __uncore_write(name__, x__, s__, trace__) \
static inline void intel_uncore_##name__(struct intel_uncore *uncore, \
i915_reg_t reg, u##x__ val) \
{ \
- uncore->funcs.mmio_write##s__(uncore, reg, val, (trace__)); \
+ uncore->funcs->mmio_write##s__(uncore, reg, val, (trace__)); \
}
__uncore_read(read8, 8, b, true)
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ __uncore_write(write_notrace, 32, l, false)
* an arbitrary delay between them. This can cause the hardware to
* act upon the intermediate value, possibly leading to corruption and
* machine death. For this reason we do not support intel_uncore_write64,
- * or uncore->funcs.mmio_writeq.
+ * or uncore->funcs->mmio_writeq.
*
* When reading a 64-bit value as two 32-bit values, the delay may cause
* the two reads to mismatch, e.g. a timestamp overflowing. Also note that
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 3:17 [Intel-gfx] i915/display: split and constify vtable (v4) Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/25] drm/i915/uncore: split the fw get function into separate vfunc Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` Dave Airlie [this message]
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] drm/i915/pm: drop get_fifo_size vfunc Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/25] drm/i915: make update_wm take a dev_priv Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/25] drm/i915/wm: provide wrappers around watermark vfuncs calls (v2) Dave Airlie
2021-09-14 17:23 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/25] drm/i915: add wrappers around cdclk vtable funcs Dave Airlie
2021-09-14 17:25 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/25] drm/i915/display: add intel_fdi_link_train wrapper Dave Airlie
2021-09-14 17:25 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/25] drm/i915: split clock gating init from display vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/25] drm/i915: split watermark vfuncs " Dave Airlie
2021-09-14 18:20 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/25] drm/i915: split color functions " Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/25] drm/i915: split audio " Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/25] drm/i915: split cdclk " Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/25] drm/i915: split irq hotplug function " Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/25] drm/i915: split fdi link training " Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/25] drm/i915: split the dpll clock compute out " Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/25] drm/i915: constify fdi link training vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/25] drm/i915: constify hotplug function vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/25] drm/i915: constify color " Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/25] drm/i915: constify the audio " Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/25] drm/i915: constify the dpll clock vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/25] drm/i915: constify the cdclk vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/25] drm/i915: drop unused function ptr and comments Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/25] drm/i915: constify display function vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/25] drm/i915: constify clock gating init vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/25] drm/i915: constify display wm vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-10 3:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [01/25] drm/i915/uncore: split the fw get function into separate vfunc Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210910031741.3292388-3-airlied@gmail.com \
--to=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox