From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18.
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:35:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211013173548.nldcwheo4t52dgvp@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWbXvvTzMF1EZ5c7@phenom.ffwll.local>
On 2021-10-13 14:57:34 [+0200], Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hm there's a pile of commits there, and nothing immediately jumps to
> light. The thing is, 18 is likely way too much, since if e.g. we have a
> single new property on a plane and that pushes over the limit on all of
> them, you get iirc 3x4 already simply because we have that many planes.
>
> So would be good to know the actual culprit.
>
> Can you pls try to bisect the above range, applying the patch as a fixup
> locally (without commit, that will confuse git bisect a bit I think), so
> we know what/where went wrong?
c7fcbf2513973 -> does not boot
c7fcbf2513973 + 2f425cf5242a0 -> boots, 18 x DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY
6f11f37459d8f -> boots, 0 x DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY
6f11f37459d8f + 2f425cf5242a0 -> boots, 18 x DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY
> I'm still confused why this isn't showing up anywhere in our intel ci ...
>
> Thanks, Daniel
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-05 6:51 [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-10-05 7:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2021-10-05 8:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-05 10:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-10-13 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2021-10-13 12:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-10-13 12:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-10-13 17:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2021-10-14 13:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-10-14 13:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-10-19 12:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-10-19 13:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-10-19 17:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18. (rev2) Patchwork
2021-10-19 17:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211013173548.nldcwheo4t52dgvp@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox