From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/28] drm/i915: Remove unused bits of i915_vma/active api
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:35:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211021103605.735002-4-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021103605.735002-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
When reworking the code to move the eviction fence to the object,
the best code is removed code.
Remove some functions that are unused, and change the function definition
if it's only used in 1 place.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 28 +++-------------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h | 17 +----------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h | 2 --
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
index 3103c1e1fd14..ee2b3a375362 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
@@ -426,8 +426,9 @@ replace_barrier(struct i915_active *ref, struct i915_active_fence *active)
return true;
}
-int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx, struct dma_fence *fence)
+int i915_active_add_request(struct i915_active *ref, struct i915_request *rq)
{
+ struct dma_fence *fence = &rq->fence;
struct i915_active_fence *active;
int err;
@@ -436,7 +437,7 @@ int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx, struct dma_fence *fence)
if (err)
return err;
- active = active_instance(ref, idx);
+ active = active_instance(ref, i915_request_timeline(rq)->fence_context);
if (!active) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
@@ -477,29 +478,6 @@ __i915_active_set_fence(struct i915_active *ref,
return prev;
}
-static struct i915_active_fence *
-__active_fence(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx)
-{
- struct active_node *it;
-
- it = __active_lookup(ref, idx);
- if (unlikely(!it)) { /* Contention with parallel tree builders! */
- spin_lock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
- it = __active_lookup(ref, idx);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
- }
- GEM_BUG_ON(!it); /* slot must be preallocated */
-
- return &it->base;
-}
-
-struct dma_fence *
-__i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx, struct dma_fence *fence)
-{
- /* Only valid while active, see i915_active_acquire_for_context() */
- return __i915_active_set_fence(ref, __active_fence(ref, idx), fence);
-}
-
struct dma_fence *
i915_active_set_exclusive(struct i915_active *ref, struct dma_fence *f)
{
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
index 5fcdb0e2bc9e..7eb44132183a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
@@ -164,26 +164,11 @@ void __i915_active_init(struct i915_active *ref,
__i915_active_init(ref, active, retire, flags, &__mkey, &__wkey); \
} while (0)
-struct dma_fence *
-__i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx, struct dma_fence *fence);
-int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx, struct dma_fence *fence);
-
-static inline int
-i915_active_add_request(struct i915_active *ref, struct i915_request *rq)
-{
- return i915_active_ref(ref,
- i915_request_timeline(rq)->fence_context,
- &rq->fence);
-}
+int i915_active_add_request(struct i915_active *ref, struct i915_request *rq);
struct dma_fence *
i915_active_set_exclusive(struct i915_active *ref, struct dma_fence *f);
-static inline bool i915_active_has_exclusive(struct i915_active *ref)
-{
- return rcu_access_pointer(ref->excl.fence);
-}
-
int __i915_active_wait(struct i915_active *ref, int state);
static inline int i915_active_wait(struct i915_active *ref)
{
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
index 90546fa58fc1..1187f1956c20 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
@@ -1220,7 +1220,7 @@ __i915_request_await_bind(struct i915_request *rq, struct i915_vma *vma)
return __i915_request_await_exclusive(rq, &vma->active);
}
-int __i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma, struct i915_request *rq)
+static int __i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma, struct i915_request *rq)
{
int err;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
index 648dbe744c96..b882fd7b5f99 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
@@ -55,8 +55,6 @@ static inline bool i915_vma_is_active(const struct i915_vma *vma)
/* do not reserve memory to prevent deadlocks */
#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE BIT(31)
-int __must_check __i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma,
- struct i915_request *rq);
int __must_check _i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma,
struct i915_request *rq,
struct dma_fence *fence,
--
2.33.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-21 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-21 10:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/28] drm/i915: Fix i915_request fence wait semantics Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/28] drm/i915: use new iterator in i915_gem_object_wait_reservation Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:38 ` Christian König
2021-10-21 11:06 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 11:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-10-28 8:41 ` Christian König
2021-10-28 15:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-11-01 9:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-11 11:36 ` Christian König
2021-11-12 16:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/28] drm/i915: Remove dma_resv_prune Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 14:43 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-22 8:48 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/28] drm/i915: Slightly rework EXEC_OBJECT_CAPTURE handling, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/28] drm/i915: Remove gen6_ppgtt_unpin_all Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/28] drm/i915: Create a dummy object for gen6 ppgtt Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 15:42 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/28] drm/i915: Create a full object for mock_ring, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 15:57 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-22 11:03 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/28] drm/i915: vma is always backed by an object Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 16:09 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/28] drm/i915: Change shrink ordering to use locking around unbinding Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 16:12 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-22 11:04 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/28] drm/i915/pm: Move CONTEXT_VALID_BIT check Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-02 16:13 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/28] drm/i915: Remove resv from i915_vma Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/28] drm/i915: Remove pages_mutex and intel_gtt->vma_ops.set/clear_pages members Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 17:30 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-22 10:59 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 12:40 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/28] drm/i915: Take object lock in i915_ggtt_pin if ww is not set Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 17:39 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 12:46 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/28] drm/i915: Add lock for unbinding to i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 17:48 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:25 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/28] drm/i915: Rework context handling in hugepages selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 17:55 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-22 6:51 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-22 7:21 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/28] drm/i915: Ensure gem_contexts selftests work with unbind changes Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/28] drm/i915: Take trylock during eviction, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 17:59 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-22 8:44 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/28] drm/i915: Pass trylock context to callers Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 18:03 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-22 8:52 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/28] drm/i915: Ensure i915_vma tests do not get -ENOSPC with the locking changes Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/28] drm/i915: Drain the ttm delayed workqueue too Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-25 15:11 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-21 10:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/28] drm/i915: Make i915_gem_evict_vm work correctly for already locked objects Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/28] drm/i915: Call i915_gem_evict_vm in vm_fault_gtt to prevent new ENOSPC errors Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/28] drm/i915: Add i915_vma_unbind_unlocked, and take obj lock for i915_vma_unbind Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/28] drm/i915: Require object lock when freeing pages during destruction Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-22 11:10 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-21 10:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/28] drm/i915: Remove assert_object_held_shared Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/28] drm/i915: Remove support for unlocked i915_vma unbind Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/28] drm/i915: Remove short-term pins from execbuf, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-25 15:02 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:44 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-10-21 10:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/28] drm/i915: Fix i915_request fence wait semantics Patchwork
2021-10-21 10:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-21 11:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-10-21 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-21 12:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-22 11:24 ` Matthew Auld
2021-10-22 13:17 ` Maarten Lankhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211021103605.735002-4-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox