From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
Cc: IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org, Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Remove pointless assert
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:14:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211029021451.GA33110@jons-linux-dev-box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021234044.3071069-2-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:40:37PM -0700, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>
> The 'many' test ended with an 'assert(count)', presumably meaning to
> ensure that some objects were actually captured. However, 'count' is
> the number of objects created not how many were captured. Plus, there
> is already a 'require(count > 1)' at the start and count is invarient
> so the final assert is basically pointless.
>
> General concensus appears to be that the test should not fail
> irrespective of how many blobs are captured as low memory situations
> could cause the capture to be abbreviated. So just remove the
> pointless assert completely.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> index 7e0a8b8ad..53649cdb2 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> @@ -524,7 +524,6 @@ static void many(int fd, int dir, uint64_t size, unsigned int flags)
> }
> igt_info("Captured %lu %"PRId64"-blobs out of a total of %lu\n",
> blobs, size >> 12, count);
> - igt_assert(count);
>
> free(error);
> free(offsets);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-29 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-21 23:40 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 0/8] Fixes for gem_exec_capture John.C.Harrison
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Remove pointless assert John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 2:14 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-11-03 13:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-03 18:44 ` John Harrison
2021-11-04 9:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Cope with larger page sizes John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-30 0:32 ` John Harrison
2021-11-02 23:18 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Make the error decode a common helper John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 2:34 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Use contexts and engines properly John.C.Harrison
2021-11-02 23:34 ` Matthew Brost
2021-11-03 1:45 ` John Harrison
2021-11-03 9:36 ` Petri Latvala
2021-11-03 18:49 ` John Harrison
2021-11-04 6:40 ` Petri Latvala
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 5/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Check for memory allocation failure John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 2:20 ` Matthew Brost
2021-11-03 14:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-03 18:36 ` John Harrison
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 6/8] lib/igt_sysfs: Support large files John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 2:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 7/8] lib/igt_gt: Allow per engine reset testing John.C.Harrison
2021-11-03 0:47 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 8/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Update to support GuC based resets John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 2:54 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211029021451.GA33110@jons-linux-dev-box \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox