public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
Cc: IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org, Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Remove pointless assert
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:14:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211029021451.GA33110@jons-linux-dev-box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021234044.3071069-2-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:40:37PM -0700, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> 
> The 'many' test ended with an 'assert(count)', presumably meaning to
> ensure that some objects were actually captured. However, 'count' is
> the number of objects created not how many were captured. Plus, there
> is already a 'require(count > 1)' at the start and count is invarient
> so the final assert is basically pointless.
> 
> General concensus appears to be that the test should not fail
> irrespective of how many blobs are captured as low memory situations
> could cause the capture to be abbreviated. So just remove the
> pointless assert completely.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>

> ---
>  tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> index 7e0a8b8ad..53649cdb2 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_capture.c
> @@ -524,7 +524,6 @@ static void many(int fd, int dir, uint64_t size, unsigned int flags)
>  	}
>  	igt_info("Captured %lu %"PRId64"-blobs out of a total of %lu\n",
>  		 blobs, size >> 12, count);
> -	igt_assert(count);
>  
>  	free(error);
>  	free(offsets);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-29  2:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-21 23:40 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 0/8] Fixes for gem_exec_capture John.C.Harrison
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Remove pointless assert John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29  2:14   ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-11-03 13:50   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-03 18:44     ` John Harrison
2021-11-04  9:14       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Cope with larger page sizes John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29 17:39   ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-30  0:32     ` John Harrison
2021-11-02 23:18       ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Make the error decode a common helper John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29  2:34   ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Use contexts and engines properly John.C.Harrison
2021-11-02 23:34   ` Matthew Brost
2021-11-03  1:45     ` John Harrison
2021-11-03  9:36       ` Petri Latvala
2021-11-03 18:49         ` John Harrison
2021-11-04  6:40           ` Petri Latvala
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 5/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Check for memory allocation failure John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29  2:20   ` Matthew Brost
2021-11-03 14:00   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-03 18:36     ` John Harrison
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 6/8] lib/igt_sysfs: Support large files John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29  2:46   ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 7/8] lib/igt_gt: Allow per engine reset testing John.C.Harrison
2021-11-03  0:47   ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-21 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 8/8] tests/i915/gem_exec_capture: Update to support GuC based resets John.C.Harrison
2021-10-29  2:54   ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211029021451.GA33110@jons-linux-dev-box \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
    --cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
    --cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox