From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
matthew.auld@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ttm: Fix illegal addition to shrinker list
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:55:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211110085527.1033475-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> (raw)
There's a small window of opportunity during which the adjust_lru()
function can be called with a GEM refcount of zero from the TTM
eviction code. This results in a kernel BUG().
Ensure that we don't attempt to modify the GEM shrinker lists unless
we have a GEM refcount.
Fixes: ebd4a8ec7799 ("drm/i915/ttm: move shrinker management into adjust_lru")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
index e98503c0830b..68cfe6e9ceab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
@@ -771,18 +771,29 @@ void i915_ttm_adjust_lru(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
*
* TODO: consider maybe also bumping the shrinker list here when we have
* already unpinned it, which should give us something more like an LRU.
+ *
+ * TODO: There is a small window of opportunity for this function to
+ * get called from eviction after we've dropped the last GEM refcount,
+ * but before the TTM deleted flag is set on the object. Avoid
+ * adjusting the shrinker list in such cases, since the object is
+ * not available to the shrinker anyway due to its zero refcount.
+ * To fix this properly we should move to a TTM shrinker LRU list for
+ * these objects.
*/
- if (shrinkable != obj->mm.ttm_shrinkable) {
- if (shrinkable) {
- if (obj->mm.madv == I915_MADV_WILLNEED)
- __i915_gem_object_make_shrinkable(obj);
- else
- __i915_gem_object_make_purgeable(obj);
- } else {
- i915_gem_object_make_unshrinkable(obj);
+ if (kref_get_unless_zero(&obj->base.refcount)) {
+ if (shrinkable != obj->mm.ttm_shrinkable) {
+ if (shrinkable) {
+ if (obj->mm.madv == I915_MADV_WILLNEED)
+ __i915_gem_object_make_shrinkable(obj);
+ else
+ __i915_gem_object_make_purgeable(obj);
+ } else {
+ i915_gem_object_make_unshrinkable(obj);
+ }
+
+ obj->mm.ttm_shrinkable = shrinkable;
}
-
- obj->mm.ttm_shrinkable = shrinkable;
+ i915_gem_object_put(obj);
}
/*
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-10 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-10 8:55 Thomas Hellström [this message]
2021-11-10 10:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/ttm: Fix illegal addition to shrinker list Patchwork
2021-11-10 10:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Matthew Auld
2021-11-10 10:31 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-11-10 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
2021-11-10 13:05 ` Thomas Hellström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211110085527.1033475-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox