From: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915: Sanity Check for device memory region
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:15:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211214094538.GB31233@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211208153404.27546-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com>
On 2021-12-08 at 21:04:01 +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> Changes for introducing the quick test on the device memory range and
> also a test of detailed validation for each addr of the range with read
> and write.
>
> Detailed testing is optionally enabled with a modparam i915.memtest=1
>
> And third patch fixes the driver accessible stolen memory.
>
> v2: Adding a wrapper for the memtest [Chris]
> v3: Handling a bisecting issue.
Thanks for the review. The changes are merged.
Ram.
>
> Chris Wilson (3):
> drm/i915: Exclude reserved stolen from driver use
> drm/i915: Sanitycheck device iomem on probe
> drm/i915: Test all device memory on probing
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 135 insertions(+)
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-08 15:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915: Sanity Check for device memory region Ramalingam C
2021-12-08 15:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Exclude reserved stolen from driver use Ramalingam C
2021-12-08 15:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Sanitycheck device iomem on probe Ramalingam C
2021-12-09 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 " Ramalingam C
2021-12-08 15:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Test all device memory on probing Ramalingam C
2021-12-08 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Sanity Check for device memory region (rev3) Patchwork
2021-12-08 20:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-12-08 20:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-12-09 2:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-12-10 3:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Sanity Check for device memory region (rev4) Patchwork
2021-12-10 3:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-12-10 3:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-12-10 13:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-12-14 6:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
2021-12-14 9:45 ` Ramalingam C [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-08 14:57 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915: Sanity Check for device memory region Ramalingam C
2021-12-08 10:20 Ramalingam C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211214094538.GB31233@intel.com \
--to=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox