From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mst: update slot information for 128b/132b
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:05:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211216140548.1255782-1-jani.nikula@intel.com> (raw)
128b/132b supports using 64 slots starting from 0, while 8b/10b reserves
slot 0 for metadata.
Commit d6c6a76f80a1 ("drm: Update MST First Link Slot Information Based
on Encoding Format") added support for updating the topology state
accordingly, and commit 41724ea273cd ("drm/amd/display: Add DP 2.0 MST
DM Support") started using it in the amd driver.
This feels more than a little cumbersome, especially updating the
information in atomic check. For i915, add the update to MST connector
.atomic_check hook rather than iterating over all MST managers and
connectors in global mode config .atomic_check. Fingers crossed.
Cc: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index b8bc7d397c81..d13c7952a8d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -302,6 +302,8 @@ intel_dp_mst_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
if (!old_conn_state->crtc)
return 0;
+ mgr = &enc_to_mst(to_intel_encoder(old_conn_state->best_encoder))->primary->dp.mst_mgr;
+
/* We only want to free VCPI if this state disables the CRTC on this
* connector
*/
@@ -309,6 +311,15 @@ intel_dp_mst_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(new_crtc);
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
+ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *topology_state;
+ u8 link_coding_cap = intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state) ?
+ DP_CAP_ANSI_128B132B : DP_CAP_ANSI_8B10B;
+
+ topology_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(&state->base, mgr);
+ if (IS_ERR(topology_state))
+ return PTR_ERR(topology_state);
+
+ drm_dp_mst_update_slots(topology_state, link_coding_cap);
if (!crtc_state ||
!drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(&crtc_state->uapi) ||
@@ -316,7 +327,6 @@ intel_dp_mst_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
return 0;
}
- mgr = &enc_to_mst(to_intel_encoder(old_conn_state->best_encoder))->primary->dp.mst_mgr;
ret = drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots(&state->base, mgr,
intel_connector->port);
@@ -357,6 +367,7 @@ static void intel_mst_disable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
struct intel_connector *connector =
to_intel_connector(old_conn_state->connector);
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
+ int start_slot = intel_dp_is_uhbr(old_crtc_state) ? 0 : 1;
int ret;
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "active links %d\n",
@@ -366,7 +377,7 @@ static void intel_mst_disable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, connector->port);
- ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, 1);
+ ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, start_slot);
if (ret) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "failed to update payload %d\n", ret);
}
@@ -475,6 +486,7 @@ static void intel_mst_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
struct intel_connector *connector =
to_intel_connector(conn_state->connector);
+ int start_slot = intel_dp_is_uhbr(pipe_config) ? 0 : 1;
int ret;
bool first_mst_stream;
@@ -509,7 +521,7 @@ static void intel_mst_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
intel_dp->active_mst_links++;
- ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, 1);
+ ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, start_slot);
/*
* Before Gen 12 this is not done as part of
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-12-16 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-16 14:05 Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-12-16 19:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/mst: update slot information for 128b/132b Patchwork
2021-12-16 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-12-17 16:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-31 13:45 ` Jani Nikula
2021-12-31 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2021-12-31 14:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/mst: update slot information for 128b/132b (rev2) Patchwork
2021-12-31 15:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/mst: update slot information for 128b/132b (rev3) Patchwork
2021-12-31 17:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211216140548.1255782-1-jani.nikula@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox