From: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
To: jbaron@akamai.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>,
daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
vincent.whitchurch@axis.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, seanpaul@chromium.org,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, joe@perches.com,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] dyndbg: fix static_branch manipulation
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 21:47:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220311044756.425777-2-jim.cromie@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220311044756.425777-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
In https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211209150910.GA23668@axis.com/
Vincent's patch commented on, and worked around, a bug toggling
static_branch's, when a 2nd PRINTK-ish flag was added. The bug
results in a premature static_branch_disable when the 1st of 2 flags
was disabled.
The cited commit computed newflags, but then in the JUMP_LABEL block,
failed to use that result, instead using just one of the terms in it.
Using newflags instead made the code work properly.
This is Vincents test-case, reduced. It needs the 2nd flag to work
properly, but it's explanatory here.
pt_test() {
echo 5 > /sys/module/dynamic_debug/verbose
site="module tcp" # just one callsite
echo " $site =_ " > /proc/dynamic_debug/control # clear it
# A B ~A ~B
for flg in +T +p "-T #broke here" -p; do
echo " $site $flg " > /proc/dynamic_debug/control
done;
# A B ~B ~A
for flg in +T +p "-p #broke here" -T; do
echo " $site $flg " > /proc/dynamic_debug/control
done
}
pt_test
Fixes: 84da83a6ffc0 dyndbg: combine flags & mask into a struct, simplify with it
CC: vincent.whitchurch@axis.com
Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
--
.drop @stable, no exposed bug.
---
lib/dynamic_debug.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
index dd7f56af9aed..a56c1286ffa4 100644
--- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c
+++ b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
@@ -211,10 +211,11 @@ static int ddebug_change(const struct ddebug_query *query,
continue;
#ifdef CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL
if (dp->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT) {
- if (!(modifiers->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT))
+ if (!(newflags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT))
static_branch_disable(&dp->key.dd_key_true);
- } else if (modifiers->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT)
+ } else if (newflags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT) {
static_branch_enable(&dp->key.dd_key_true);
+ }
#endif
dp->flags = newflags;
v4pr_info("changed %s:%d [%s]%s =%s\n",
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-11 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-11 4:47 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] dyndbg add exclusive class support Jim Cromie
2022-03-11 4:47 ` Jim Cromie [this message]
2022-03-11 18:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] dyndbg: fix static_branch manipulation Jason Baron
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] dyndbg: add class_id field and query support Jim Cromie
2022-03-11 19:06 ` Jason Baron
2022-03-12 1:06 ` jim.cromie
2022-03-14 21:29 ` Jason Baron
2022-03-28 19:07 ` jim.cromie
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] dyndbg: add DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_CLASSBITS macro Jim Cromie
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] dyndbg: drop EXPORTed dynamic_debug_exec_queries Jim Cromie
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] dyndbg: show both old and new in change-info Jim Cromie
2022-03-11 5:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for dyndbg add exclusive class support Patchwork
2022-03-11 5:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-11 5:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-11 7:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-03-23 16:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for dyndbg add exclusive class support (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220311044756.425777-2-jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--to=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
--cc=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox