From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
vneethv@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
jjherne@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com,
jchrist@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com,
freude@linux.ibm.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFT][PATCH v1 5/6] vfio/ccw: Add kmap_local_page() for memcpy
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:30:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220624193042.GB4147@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YrYO/KAa2bqmxEIu@Asurada-Nvidia>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 12:22:36PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:56:15AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> > > How about the updated commit log below? Thanks.
> > >
> > > The pinned PFN list returned from vfio_pin_pages() is converted using
> > > page_to_pfn(), so direct access via memcpy() will crash on S390 if the
> > > PFN is an IO PFN, as we have to use the memcpy_to/fromio(), which uses
> > > the special s390 IO access instructions.
> > >
> > > As a standard practice for security purpose, add kmap_local_page() to
> > > block any IO memory from ever getting into this call path.
> >
> > The kmap_local_page is not about the IO memory, the switch to struct
> > page is what is protecting against IO memory.
> >
> > Use kmap_local_page() is just the correct way to convert a struct page
> > into a CPU address to use with memcpy and it is a NOP on S390 because
> > it doesn't use highmem/etc.
>
> I thought the whole purpose of switching to "struct page *" was to use
> kmap_local_page() for the memcpy call, and the combination of these two
> does the protection. Do you mind explaining how the switching part does
> the protection?
A 'struct page' (ignoring ZONE_DEVICE) cannot represent IO memory
inherently because a 'struct page' is always a CPU coherent thing.
So, when VFIO returns only struct pages it also is promising that the
memory is not IO.
The kmap_local_page() arose because the code doing memcpy had to be
updated to go from a struct page to a void * for use with memcpy and
the kmap_local_page() is the correct API to use for that.
The existing code which casts a pfn to a void * is improper.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220616235212.15185-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com>
[not found] ` <20220616235212.15185-4-nicolinc@nvidia.com>
2022-06-17 8:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFT][PATCH v1 3/6] vfio: Pass in starting IOVA to vfio_pin/unpin_pages API Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-22 1:18 ` Nicolin Chen
[not found] ` <20220616235212.15185-6-nicolinc@nvidia.com>
2022-06-17 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFT][PATCH v1 5/6] vfio/ccw: Add kmap_local_page() for memcpy Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-20 2:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-20 6:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-20 15:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-21 21:21 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-24 13:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <YrYO/KAa2bqmxEIu@Asurada-Nvidia>
2022-06-24 19:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
[not found] ` <YrYayPvA7XlCZLQ2@Asurada-Nvidia>
2022-06-24 22:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20220616235212.15185-7-nicolinc@nvidia.com>
2022-06-17 8:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFT][PATCH v1 6/6] vfio: Replace phys_pfn with phys_page for vfio_pin_pages() Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <Yqz64VK1IQ0QzXEe@Asurada-Nvidia>
2022-06-19 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-20 3:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-20 5:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-20 6:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-20 15:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-21 21:47 ` Nicolin Chen
[not found] ` <20220616235212.15185-2-nicolinc@nvidia.com>
[not found] ` <fd564e6270a4bfcd9249559a797365ae@linux.ibm.com>
2022-06-21 21:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFT][PATCH v1 1/6] vfio/ap: Pass in physical address of ind to ap_aqic() Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220624193042.GB4147@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jchrist@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox