Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/9] lib/i915_drm_local: Add I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 20:06:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220629190658.395463-1-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)

For now dump into i915_drm_local.h. Once the uapi on the kernel side is
merged, and is part of drm-next, we can sync the kernel headers and
remove this.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
---
 lib/i915/i915_drm_local.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/i915/i915_drm_local.h b/lib/i915/i915_drm_local.h
index 9a2273c4..ac35abf6 100644
--- a/lib/i915/i915_drm_local.h
+++ b/lib/i915/i915_drm_local.h
@@ -23,6 +23,27 @@ extern "C" {
 
 #define DRM_I915_QUERY_GEOMETRY_SUBSLICES      6
 
+/*
+ * Signal to the kernel that the object will need to be accessed via
+ * the CPU.
+ *
+ * Only valid when placing objects in I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, and only
+ * strictly required on platforms where only some of the device memory
+ * is directly visible or mappable through the CPU, like on DG2+.
+ *
+ * One of the placements MUST also be I915_MEMORY_CLASS_SYSTEM, to
+ * ensure we can always spill the allocation to system memory, if we
+ * can't place the object in the mappable part of
+ * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE.
+ *
+ * Without this hint, the kernel will assume that non-mappable
+ * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE is preferred for this object. Note that the
+ * kernel can still migrate the object to the mappable part, as a last
+ * resort, if userspace ever CPU faults this object, but this might be
+ * expensive, and so ideally should be avoided.
+ */
+#define I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS (1 << 0)
+
 #if defined(__cplusplus)
 }
 #endif
-- 
2.36.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-06-29 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-29 19:06 Matthew Auld [this message]
2022-06-29 19:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/9] lib/i915: wire up optional flags for gem_create_ext Matthew Auld
2022-06-29 19:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/9] tests/i915/gem_create: exercise NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS Matthew Auld
2022-06-29 19:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/9] lib/i915: add gem_create_with_cpu_access_in_memory_regions Matthew Auld
2022-06-29 19:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 5/9] tests/i915/query: sanity check the probed_cpu_visible_size Matthew Auld
2022-06-29 19:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 6/9] tests/i915/query: sanity check the unallocated tracking Matthew Auld
2022-06-29 19:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 7/9] lib/i915/intel_memory_region: plumb through the cpu_size Matthew Auld
2022-06-29 19:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 8/9] tests/i915/capture: handle uapi changes Matthew Auld
2022-06-29 19:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 9/9] lib/i915: request CPU_ACCESS for fb objects Matthew Auld
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-25 18:36 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 0/9] small BAR uapi bits Matthew Auld
2022-05-25 18:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/9] lib/i915_drm_local: Add I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS Matthew Auld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220629190658.395463-1-matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox