public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/i915: Move locking and unclaimed check into mmio_debug_{suspend, resume}
Date: Fri,  2 Sep 2022 16:32:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220902233257.3088492-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220902233257.3088492-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Moving the locking for MMIO debug (and the final check for unclaimed
accesses when resuming debug after a userspace-initiated forcewake) will
make it simpler to completely skip MMIO debug handling on uncores that
don't support it in future patches.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 41 +++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 9b81b2543ce2..e717ea55484a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -50,23 +50,33 @@ intel_uncore_mmio_debug_init_early(struct intel_uncore_mmio_debug *mmio_debug)
 	mmio_debug->unclaimed_mmio_check = 1;
 }
 
-static void mmio_debug_suspend(struct intel_uncore_mmio_debug *mmio_debug)
+static void mmio_debug_suspend(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&mmio_debug->lock);
+	spin_lock(&uncore->debug->lock);
 
 	/* Save and disable mmio debugging for the user bypass */
-	if (!mmio_debug->suspend_count++) {
-		mmio_debug->saved_mmio_check = mmio_debug->unclaimed_mmio_check;
-		mmio_debug->unclaimed_mmio_check = 0;
+	if (!uncore->debug->suspend_count++) {
+		uncore->debug->saved_mmio_check = uncore->debug->unclaimed_mmio_check;
+		uncore->debug->unclaimed_mmio_check = 0;
 	}
+
+	spin_unlock(&uncore->debug->lock);
 }
 
-static void mmio_debug_resume(struct intel_uncore_mmio_debug *mmio_debug)
+static bool check_for_unclaimed_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore);
+
+static void mmio_debug_resume(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&mmio_debug->lock);
+	spin_lock(&uncore->debug->lock);
+
+	if (!--uncore->debug->suspend_count)
+		uncore->debug->unclaimed_mmio_check = uncore->debug->saved_mmio_check;
 
-	if (!--mmio_debug->suspend_count)
-		mmio_debug->unclaimed_mmio_check = mmio_debug->saved_mmio_check;
+	if (check_for_unclaimed_mmio(uncore))
+		drm_info(&uncore->i915->drm,
+			 "Invalid mmio detected during user access\n");
+
+	spin_unlock(&uncore->debug->lock);
 }
 
 static const char * const forcewake_domain_names[] = {
@@ -677,9 +687,7 @@ void intel_uncore_forcewake_user_get(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 	spin_lock_irq(&uncore->lock);
 	if (!uncore->user_forcewake_count++) {
 		intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
-		spin_lock(&uncore->debug->lock);
-		mmio_debug_suspend(uncore->debug);
-		spin_unlock(&uncore->debug->lock);
+		mmio_debug_suspend(uncore);
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&uncore->lock);
 }
@@ -695,14 +703,7 @@ void intel_uncore_forcewake_user_put(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 {
 	spin_lock_irq(&uncore->lock);
 	if (!--uncore->user_forcewake_count) {
-		spin_lock(&uncore->debug->lock);
-		mmio_debug_resume(uncore->debug);
-
-		if (check_for_unclaimed_mmio(uncore))
-			drm_info(&uncore->i915->drm,
-				 "Invalid mmio detected during user access\n");
-		spin_unlock(&uncore->debug->lock);
-
+		mmio_debug_resume(uncore);
 		intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&uncore->lock);
-- 
2.37.2


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-02 23:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-02 23:32 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/12] i915: Add "standalone media" support for MTL Matt Roper
2022-09-02 23:32 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2022-09-06 13:39   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/i915: Move locking and unclaimed check into mmio_debug_{suspend, resume} Ruhl, Michael J
2022-09-06 17:08     ` Matt Roper
2022-09-06 17:10       ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-09-02 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915: Only hook up uncore->debug for primary uncore Matt Roper
2022-09-02 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915: Use managed allocations for extra uncore objects Matt Roper
2022-09-02 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915: Prepare more multi-GT initialization Matt Roper
2022-09-02 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915: Rename and expose common GT early init routine Matt Roper
2022-09-02 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915: Use a DRM-managed action to release the PCI bridge device Matt Roper
2022-09-02 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915: Initialize MMIO access for each GT Matt Roper
2022-09-02 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/i915: Handle each GT on init/release and suspend/resume Matt Roper
2022-09-02 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/12] drm/i915/uncore: Add GSI offset to uncore Matt Roper
2022-09-06 10:44   ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2022-09-06 19:26     ` Matt Roper
2022-09-02 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/12] drm/i915/xelpmp: Expose media as another GT Matt Roper
2022-09-06  8:57   ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2022-09-02 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/i915/mtl: Use primary GT's irq lock for media GT Matt Roper
2022-09-02 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915/mtl: Hook up interrupts for standalone media Matt Roper
2022-09-02 23:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915: Add "standalone media" support for MTL (rev3) Patchwork
2022-09-02 23:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-09-03  0:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-09-03  1:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220902233257.3088492-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox