From: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
To: Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Cc: DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/i915: Make the heartbeat play nice with long pre-emption timeouts
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 19:18:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220929021813.2172701-4-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220929021813.2172701-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Compute workloads are inherently not pre-emptible for long periods on
current hardware. As a workaround for this, the pre-emption timeout
for compute capable engines was disabled. This is undesirable with GuC
submission as it prevents per engine reset of hung contexts. Hence the
next patch will re-enable the timeout but bumped up by an order of
magnitude.
However, the heartbeat might not respect that. Depending upon current
activity, a pre-emption to the heartbeat pulse might not even be
attempted until the last heartbeat period. Which means that only one
period is granted for the pre-emption to occur. With the aforesaid
bump, the pre-emption timeout could be significantly larger than this
heartbeat period.
So adjust the heartbeat code to take the pre-emption timeout into
account. When it reaches the final (high priority) period, it now
ensures the delay before hitting reset is bigger than the pre-emption
timeout.
v2: Fix for selftests which adjust the heartbeat period manually.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
---
.../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c
index a3698f611f457..823a790a0e2ae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c
@@ -22,9 +22,28 @@
static bool next_heartbeat(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
+ struct i915_request *rq;
long delay;
delay = READ_ONCE(engine->props.heartbeat_interval_ms);
+
+ rq = engine->heartbeat.systole;
+
+ if (rq && rq->sched.attr.priority >= I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER &&
+ delay == engine->defaults.heartbeat_interval_ms) {
+ long longer;
+
+ /*
+ * The final try is at the highest priority possible. Up until now
+ * a pre-emption might not even have been attempted. So make sure
+ * this last attempt allows enough time for a pre-emption to occur.
+ */
+ longer = READ_ONCE(engine->props.preempt_timeout_ms) * 2;
+ longer = intel_clamp_heartbeat_interval_ms(engine, longer);
+ if (longer > delay)
+ delay = longer;
+ }
+
if (!delay)
return false;
--
2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-29 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-29 2:18 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads John.C.Harrison
2022-09-29 2:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/i915/guc: Limit scheduling properties to avoid overflow John.C.Harrison
2022-09-29 7:39 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-09-29 2:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/i915: Fix compute pre-emption w/a to apply to compute engines John.C.Harrison
2022-09-29 2:18 ` John.C.Harrison [this message]
2022-09-29 7:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/i915: Make the heartbeat play nice with long pre-emption timeouts Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-09-29 16:21 ` John Harrison
2022-09-30 9:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-09-30 17:44 ` John Harrison
2022-10-03 7:53 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-10-03 12:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-10-05 18:48 ` John Harrison
2022-10-06 10:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-09-29 2:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/i915: Improve long running compute w/a for GuC submission John.C.Harrison
2022-09-29 7:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-09-29 2:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Improve anti-pre-emption w/a for compute workloads (rev7) Patchwork
2022-09-29 2:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-09-29 2:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-09-30 2:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220929021813.2172701-4-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
--to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox