Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Don't flag both full modeset and fastset at the same time
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:04:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221020120457.19528-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221020120457.19528-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Be consistent in whether we flag a full modeset or a
fastset for the pipe. intel_modeset_all_pipes() would
seem to be the only codepath not getting this right.
And let's add a WARN to make sure we did get it right.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index b6004b3e6684..7b48ad20c548 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -5974,6 +5974,7 @@ int intel_modeset_all_pipes(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 			    crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name, reason);
 
 		crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true;
+		crtc_state->update_pipe = false;
 
 		ret = drm_atomic_add_affected_connectors(&state->base,
 							 &crtc->base);
@@ -6925,6 +6926,11 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
 		if (ret)
 			goto fail;
 
+		/* Either full modeset or fastset (or neither), never both */
+		drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
+			    intel_crtc_needs_modeset(new_crtc_state) &&
+			    intel_crtc_needs_fastset(new_crtc_state));
+
 		if (!intel_crtc_needs_modeset(new_crtc_state) &&
 		    !intel_crtc_needs_fastset(new_crtc_state))
 			continue;
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-20 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-20 12:04 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: Clean up crtc state flag checks Ville Syrjala
2022-10-20 12:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Introduce intel_crtc_needs_fastset() Ville Syrjala
2022-10-20 12:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Remove some local 'mode_changed' bools Ville Syrjala
2022-10-20 12:04 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2022-10-20 12:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Introduce intel_crtc_needs_color_update() Ville Syrjala
2022-10-20 13:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: Clean up crtc state flag checks Jani Nikula
2022-10-20 14:17   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-20 15:02     ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-20 15:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2022-10-21 15:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Clean up crtc state flag checks (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221020120457.19528-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox