From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: restore probe_range behaviour
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 18:21:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221024172139.80435-1-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
The conversion looks harmless, however the addr value is updated inside
the loop with the previous vm_end, which then incorrectly leads to
for_each_vma_range() iterating over stuff outside the range we care
about. Fix this by storing the end value separately.
Testcase: igt@gem_userptr_blits@probe
Fixes: f683b9d61319 ("i915: use the VMA iterator")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
index b7e24476a0fd..dadb3e3fa9c8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
@@ -427,9 +427,10 @@ probe_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len)
{
VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, mm, addr);
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+ unsigned long end = addr + len;
mmap_read_lock(mm);
- for_each_vma_range(vmi, vma, addr + len) {
+ for_each_vma_range(vmi, vma, end) {
/* Check for holes, note that we also update the addr below */
if (vma->vm_start > addr)
break;
--
2.37.3
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-24 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-24 17:21 Matthew Auld [this message]
2022-10-24 23:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/userptr: restore probe_range behaviour Patchwork
2022-10-25 15:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-10-25 15:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-10-25 16:01 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-10-26 10:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/userptr: restore probe_range behaviour (rev2) Patchwork
2022-10-26 20:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221024172139.80435-1-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox