From: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Fix intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:42:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221101094222.22091-3-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221101094222.22091-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
We currently always exit that bpp loop because
drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots doesn't care if we actually
can fit those or not.
I think that wasn't the initial intention here, especially when
we keep trying with lower bpps, we are supposed to keep trying
until we actually find some _working_ configuration, which isn't the
case here.
So added that drm_dp_mst_check here, so that we can make sure
that try all the bpps before we fail.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index cd4e61026d98..421bbcaed664 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
int bpp, slots = -EINVAL;
+ int ret = 0;
mst_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, &intel_dp->mst_mgr);
if (IS_ERR(mst_state))
@@ -84,10 +85,21 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
connector->port, crtc_state->pbn);
if (slots == -EDEADLK)
return slots;
- if (slots >= 0)
- break;
+ if (slots >= 0) {
+ ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check(state);
+ /*
+ * If we got slots >= 0 and we can fit those based on check
+ * then we can exit the loop. Otherwise keep trying.
+ */
+ if (!ret)
+ break;
+ }
}
+ /* Despite slots are non-zero, we still failed the atomic check */
+ if (ret && slots >= 0)
+ slots = ret;
+
if (slots < 0) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "failed finding vcpi slots:%d\n",
slots);
--
2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-01 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-01 9:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-11-01 9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm: Add missing DP DSC extended capability definitions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-11-01 9:42 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy [this message]
2022-11-01 9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Extract drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots cycle to separate function Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-11-01 9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Add DSC support to MST path Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-11-01 9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Extract VESA DSC bpp alignment to separate function Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-11-03 13:21 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-11-10 0:08 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-11-23 10:05 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-12-08 18:29 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-11-01 9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Bpp/timeslot calculation fixes for DP MST DSC Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-11-01 13:48 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-03 13:23 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-11-10 22:23 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-11-22 10:39 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-11-22 20:40 ` Navare, Manasi D
2022-11-23 10:07 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-11-01 12:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add DP MST DSC support to i915 (rev14) Patchwork
2022-11-01 12:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-11-01 12:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-11-03 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for Add DP MST DSC support to i915 (rev16) Patchwork
2022-11-03 15:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-04 10:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-11-23 10:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add DP MST DSC support to i915 (rev18) Patchwork
2022-11-23 10:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-11-23 11:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221101094222.22091-3-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
--to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox