From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/9] drm/ttm: remove ttm_bo_(un)lock_delayed_workqueue
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 11:21:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221125102137.1801-2-christian.koenig@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221125102137.1801-1-christian.koenig@amd.com>
Those functions never worked correctly since it is still perfectly
possible that a buffer object is released and the background worker
restarted even after calling them.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c | 6 +-----
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 4 +---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c | 5 -----
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c | 4 +---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 14 --------------
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 16 ----------------
6 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
index 0f16d3c09309..f60753f97ac5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
@@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ static void amdgpu_ib_preempt_mark_partial_job(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
static int amdgpu_debugfs_ib_preempt(void *data, u64 val)
{
- int r, resched, length;
+ int r, length;
struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
struct dma_fence **fences = NULL;
struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)data;
@@ -1747,8 +1747,6 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_ib_preempt(void *data, u64 val)
/* stop the scheduler */
kthread_park(ring->sched.thread);
- resched = ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue(&adev->mman.bdev);
-
/* preempt the IB */
r = amdgpu_ring_preempt_ib(ring);
if (r) {
@@ -1785,8 +1783,6 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_ib_preempt(void *data, u64 val)
up_read(&adev->reset_domain->sem);
- ttm_bo_unlock_delayed_workqueue(&adev->mman.bdev, resched);
-
pro_end:
kfree(fences);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index b2b1c66bfe39..2b1db37e25c1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -3983,10 +3983,8 @@ void amdgpu_device_fini_hw(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
}
amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_fini(adev);
- if (adev->mman.initialized) {
+ if (adev->mman.initialized)
flush_delayed_work(&adev->mman.bdev.wq);
- ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue(&adev->mman.bdev);
- }
if (adev->pm_sysfs_en)
amdgpu_pm_sysfs_fini(adev);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
index 6344454a7721..9a556f505685 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
@@ -1772,7 +1772,6 @@ int radeon_gpu_reset(struct radeon_device *rdev)
bool saved = false;
int i, r;
- int resched;
down_write(&rdev->exclusive_lock);
@@ -1784,8 +1783,6 @@ int radeon_gpu_reset(struct radeon_device *rdev)
atomic_inc(&rdev->gpu_reset_counter);
radeon_save_bios_scratch_regs(rdev);
- /* block TTM */
- resched = ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue(&rdev->mman.bdev);
radeon_suspend(rdev);
radeon_hpd_fini(rdev);
@@ -1844,8 +1841,6 @@ int radeon_gpu_reset(struct radeon_device *rdev)
/* reset hpd state */
radeon_hpd_init(rdev);
- ttm_bo_unlock_delayed_workqueue(&rdev->mman.bdev, resched);
-
rdev->in_reset = true;
rdev->needs_reset = false;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
index 04c693ca419a..cbc554928bcc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
@@ -1853,11 +1853,10 @@ static bool radeon_pm_debug_check_in_vbl(struct radeon_device *rdev, bool finish
static void radeon_dynpm_idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct radeon_device *rdev;
- int resched;
+
rdev = container_of(work, struct radeon_device,
pm.dynpm_idle_work.work);
- resched = ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue(&rdev->mman.bdev);
mutex_lock(&rdev->pm.mutex);
if (rdev->pm.dynpm_state == DYNPM_STATE_ACTIVE) {
int not_processed = 0;
@@ -1908,7 +1907,6 @@ static void radeon_dynpm_idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
msecs_to_jiffies(RADEON_IDLE_LOOP_MS));
}
mutex_unlock(&rdev->pm.mutex);
- ttm_bo_unlock_delayed_workqueue(&rdev->mman.bdev, resched);
}
/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index c3f4b33136e5..b77262a623e0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -418,20 +418,6 @@ void ttm_bo_put(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_put);
-int ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue(struct ttm_device *bdev)
-{
- return cancel_delayed_work_sync(&bdev->wq);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue);
-
-void ttm_bo_unlock_delayed_workqueue(struct ttm_device *bdev, int resched)
-{
- if (resched)
- schedule_delayed_work(&bdev->wq,
- ((HZ / 100) < 1) ? 1 : HZ / 100);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_unlock_delayed_workqueue);
-
static int ttm_bo_bounce_temp_buffer(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
struct ttm_resource **mem,
struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
index 44a538ee5e2a..7758347c461c 100644
--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
@@ -290,22 +290,6 @@ void ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
void ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
struct ttm_lru_bulk_move *bulk);
-/**
- * ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue
- *
- * Prevent the delayed workqueue from running.
- * Returns
- * True if the workqueue was queued at the time
- */
-int ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue(struct ttm_device *bdev);
-
-/**
- * ttm_bo_unlock_delayed_workqueue
- *
- * Allows the delayed workqueue to run.
- */
-void ttm_bo_unlock_delayed_workqueue(struct ttm_device *bdev, int resched);
-
/**
* ttm_bo_eviction_valuable
*
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-25 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-25 10:21 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/amdgpu: generally allow over-commit during BO allocation Christian König
2022-11-25 10:21 ` Christian König [this message]
2022-11-25 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/ttm: use per BO cleanup workers Christian König
2022-11-29 21:14 ` Felix Kuehling
2022-12-05 13:39 ` Christian König
2023-06-13 13:05 ` Karol Herbst
2023-06-13 13:59 ` Christian König
2023-06-13 14:18 ` Karol Herbst
2023-06-15 11:19 ` Christian König
2023-06-15 12:04 ` Karol Herbst
2022-11-25 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/ttm: merge ttm_bo_api.h and ttm_bo_driver.h Christian König
2022-11-25 12:43 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-25 21:19 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-25 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/nouveau: stop using ttm_bo_wait Christian König
2022-11-25 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/qxl: " Christian König
2022-12-15 14:19 ` Christian König
2022-12-15 20:09 ` Dave Airlie
2022-11-25 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: " Christian König
2022-11-25 11:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-11-25 12:46 ` Christian König
2022-11-29 18:05 ` Matthew Auld
2022-11-30 13:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-11-30 14:06 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-12-05 19:58 ` Christian König
2022-12-06 18:03 ` Matthew Auld
2022-12-06 18:06 ` Christian König
2022-11-25 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/ttm: use ttm_bo_wait_ctx instead of ttm_bo_wait Christian König
2022-11-25 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/ttm: move ttm_bo_wait into VMWGFX Christian König
2022-11-25 11:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/9] drm/amdgpu: generally allow over-commit during BO allocation Patchwork
2022-11-25 11:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-11-25 11:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-11-25 11:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-25 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] " Alex Deucher
2022-12-05 13:41 ` Christian König
2022-11-28 6:00 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2022-12-10 6:15 ` Felix Kuehling
2022-12-10 14:12 ` Christian König
2022-12-11 1:13 ` Felix Kuehling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221125102137.1801-2-christian.koenig@amd.com \
--to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox