public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: alex.williamson@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, yi.l.liu@intel.com,
	yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	joro@8bytes.org, cohuck@redhat.com, xudong.hao@intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	terrence.xu@intel.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, jasowang@redhat.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/5] vfio-iommufd: Make vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind() return iommufd_access ID
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 05:15:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230316121526.5644-4-yi.l.liu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230316121526.5644-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com>

vfio device cdev needs to return iommufd_access ID to userspace if
bind_iommufd succeeds.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c   | 4 +++-
 drivers/iommu/iommufd/selftest.c | 3 ++-
 drivers/vfio/iommufd.c           | 2 +-
 include/linux/iommufd.h          | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
index 99d34c81d786..0295140dd384 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ void iommufd_access_destroy_object(struct iommufd_object *obj)
  * @ioas_id: ID for a IOMMUFD_OBJ_IOAS
  * @ops: Driver's ops to associate with the access
  * @data: Opaque data to pass into ops functions
+ * @id: Output ID number to return to userspace for this access
  *
  * An iommufd_access allows a driver to read/write to the IOAS without using
  * DMA. The underlying CPU memory can be accessed using the
@@ -435,7 +436,7 @@ void iommufd_access_destroy_object(struct iommufd_object *obj)
  */
 struct iommufd_access *
 iommufd_access_create(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
-		      const struct iommufd_access_ops *ops, void *data)
+		      const struct iommufd_access_ops *ops, void *data, u32 *id)
 {
 	struct iommufd_access *access;
 
@@ -460,6 +461,7 @@ iommufd_access_create(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
 	access->ictx = ictx;
 	iommufd_ctx_get(ictx);
 	iommufd_object_finalize(ictx, &access->obj);
+	*id = access->obj.id;
 	return access;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_create, IOMMUFD);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/selftest.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/selftest.c
index 0eabda430c9f..65e3bdaadd67 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/selftest.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/selftest.c
@@ -554,6 +554,7 @@ static int iommufd_test_create_access(struct iommufd_ucmd *ucmd,
 	struct iommu_test_cmd *cmd = ucmd->cmd;
 	struct selftest_access *staccess;
 	struct iommufd_access *access;
+	u32 id;
 	int fdno;
 	int rc;
 
@@ -575,7 +576,7 @@ static int iommufd_test_create_access(struct iommufd_ucmd *ucmd,
 		(flags & MOCK_FLAGS_ACCESS_CREATE_NEEDS_PIN_PAGES) ?
 			&selftest_access_ops_pin :
 			&selftest_access_ops,
-		staccess);
+		staccess, &id);
 	if (IS_ERR(access)) {
 		rc = PTR_ERR(access);
 		goto out_put_fdno;
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
index b576d4c7b79b..e40c0e9fea30 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev,
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
 
-	user = iommufd_access_create(ictx, &vfio_user_ops, vdev);
+	user = iommufd_access_create(ictx, &vfio_user_ops, vdev, out_device_id);
 	if (IS_ERR(user))
 		return PTR_ERR(user);
 	vdev->iommufd_access = user;
diff --git a/include/linux/iommufd.h b/include/linux/iommufd.h
index 155d3630aedc..1129a36a74c4 100644
--- a/include/linux/iommufd.h
+++ b/include/linux/iommufd.h
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ enum {
 
 struct iommufd_access *
 iommufd_access_create(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
-		      const struct iommufd_access_ops *ops, void *data);
+		      const struct iommufd_access_ops *ops, void *data, u32 *id);
 void iommufd_access_destroy(struct iommufd_access *access);
 int iommufd_access_attach(struct iommufd_access *access, u32 ioas_id);
 
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-16 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-16 12:15 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/5] vfio: Make emulated devices prepared for vfio device cdev Yi Liu
2023-03-16 12:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/5] iommufd: Create access in vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind() Yi Liu
2023-03-20 17:34   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-16 12:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/5] vfio-iommufd: No need to record iommufd_ctx in vfio_device Yi Liu
2023-03-17  1:05   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-16 12:15 ` Yi Liu [this message]
2023-03-16 12:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/5] vfio/mdev: Uses the vfio emulated iommufd ops set in the mdev sample drivers Yi Liu
2023-03-17  1:05   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-16 12:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/5] vfio: Check the presence for iommufd callbacks in __vfio_register_dev() Yi Liu
2023-03-17  1:06   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-16 20:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for vfio: Make emulated devices prepared for vfio device cdev (rev3) Patchwork
2023-03-17  8:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/5] vfio: Make emulated devices prepared for vfio device cdev Xu, Terrence
2023-03-17 10:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for vfio: Make emulated devices prepared for vfio device cdev (rev3) Patchwork
2023-03-17 10:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230316121526.5644-4-yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lulu@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=terrence.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox