Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/display: Eliminate IS_METEORLAKE checks
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 15:28:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230718222753.1075713-17-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230718222753.1075713-10-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Most of the IS_METEORLAKE checks in the display code shouldn't actually
be tied to MTL as a platform, but rather to the Xe_LPD+ display IP
(which is used in MTL, but may show up again in future platforms).  In
cases where we're trying to match that specific IP, use a version check
against IP_VER(14, 0).  For cases where we're just handling new behavior
introduced by this IP (but which may also be inherited by future IP as
well), use a ver >= 14 check.

The one exception here is the stolen memory workaround Wa_13010847436
(which is mislabelled as "Wa_22018444074" in the code).  That's truly a
MTL-specific issue rather than being tied to any of the IP blocks, so
leaving the condition as IS_METEORLAKE is correct there.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c   | 4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c     | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
index dcc1f6941b60..4cb1dc397b62 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -1840,7 +1840,7 @@ static bool cdclk_compute_crawl_and_squash_midpoint(struct drm_i915_private *i91
 
 static bool pll_enable_wa_needed(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
-	return ((IS_DG2(dev_priv) || IS_METEORLAKE(dev_priv)) &&
+	return ((IS_DG2(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER_FULL(dev_priv) == IP_VER(14, 0)) &&
 		dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco > 0 &&
 		HAS_CDCLK_SQUASH(dev_priv));
 }
@@ -3559,7 +3559,7 @@ static const struct intel_cdclk_funcs i830_cdclk_funcs = {
  */
 void intel_init_cdclk_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
-	if (IS_METEORLAKE(dev_priv)) {
+	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 14) {
 		dev_priv->display.funcs.cdclk = &mtl_cdclk_funcs;
 		dev_priv->display.cdclk.table = mtl_cdclk_table;
 	} else if (IS_DG2(dev_priv)) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
index 1b00ef2c6185..025c80b9fece 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 
 bool intel_is_c10phy(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum phy phy)
 {
-	if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915) && (phy < PHY_C))
+	if (DISPLAY_VER_FULL(i915) == IP_VER(14, 0) && (phy < PHY_C))
 		return true;
 
 	return false;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 43cba98f7753..85efd77f491b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ bool intel_phy_is_tc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy)
 	if (IS_DG2(dev_priv))
 		/* DG2's "TC1" output uses a SNPS PHY */
 		return false;
-	else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || IS_METEORLAKE(dev_priv))
+	else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER_FULL(dev_priv) == IP_VER(14, 0))
 		return phy >= PHY_F && phy <= PHY_I;
 	else if (IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv))
 		return phy >= PHY_D && phy <= PHY_I;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
index 5f479f3828bb..1623c0c5e8a1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
@@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ void intel_dmc_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 
 	INIT_WORK(&dmc->work, dmc_load_work_fn);
 
-	if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915)) {
+	if (DISPLAY_VER_FULL(i915) == IP_VER(14, 0)) {
 		dmc->fw_path = MTL_DMC_PATH;
 		dmc->max_fw_size = XELPDP_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
 	} else if (IS_DG2(i915)) {
-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-18 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18 22:27 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Reduce MTL-specific platform checks Matt Roper
2023-07-18 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Consolidate condition for Wa_22011802037 Matt Roper
2023-07-19 17:22   ` Gustavo Sousa
2023-07-18 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/xelpg: Call Xe_LPG workaround functions based on IP version Matt Roper
2023-07-19 18:30   ` Gustavo Sousa
2023-07-18 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Eliminate IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP Matt Roper
2023-07-19  8:01   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-19 15:28     ` Matt Roper
2023-07-19 22:54       ` Matt Roper
2023-07-20  9:36         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-20 13:10           ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-07-25  0:12             ` Matt Roper
2023-07-20  9:23       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-18 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Eliminate IS_MTL_MEDIA_STEP Matt Roper
2023-07-18 22:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Eliminate IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP Matt Roper
2023-07-19 19:22   ` Gustavo Sousa
2023-07-18 22:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/mtl: Eliminate subplatforms Matt Roper
2023-07-19 18:13   ` Garg, Nemesa
2023-07-19 19:27   ` Gustavo Sousa
2023-07-18 22:28 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2023-07-19 19:39   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/display: Eliminate IS_METEORLAKE checks Gustavo Sousa
2023-07-19 19:43     ` Gustavo Sousa
2023-07-18 22:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Replace several IS_METEORLAKE with proper IP version checks Matt Roper
2023-07-19  7:57   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-19 15:22     ` Matt Roper
2023-07-20  9:19       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-18 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Reduce MTL-specific platform checks Patchwork
2023-07-18 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-07-19  0:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-07-19  1:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230718222753.1075713-17-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox