From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/i915/display: Eliminate IS_METEORLAKE checks
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:13:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230725001312.1907319-19-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230725001312.1907319-11-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Most of the IS_METEORLAKE checks in the display code shouldn't actually
be tied to MTL as a platform, but rather to the Xe_LPD+ display IP
(which is used in MTL, but may show up again in future platforms). In
cases where we're trying to match that specific IP, use a version check
against IP_VER(14, 0). For cases where we're just handling new behavior
introduced by this IP (but which may also be inherited by future IP as
well), use a ver >= 14 check.
The one exception here is the stolen memory workaround Wa_13010847436
(which is mislabelled as "Wa_22018444074" in the code). That's truly a
MTL-specific issue rather than being tied to any of the IP blocks, so
leaving the condition as IS_METEORLAKE is correct there.
v2:
- cdclk check should be >=, not >. (Gustavo)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
index dcc1f6941b60..5ec39cc15332 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -1840,7 +1840,7 @@ static bool cdclk_compute_crawl_and_squash_midpoint(struct drm_i915_private *i91
static bool pll_enable_wa_needed(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
- return ((IS_DG2(dev_priv) || IS_METEORLAKE(dev_priv)) &&
+ return ((IS_DG2(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER_FULL(dev_priv) == IP_VER(14, 0)) &&
dev_priv->display.cdclk.hw.vco > 0 &&
HAS_CDCLK_SQUASH(dev_priv));
}
@@ -3559,7 +3559,7 @@ static const struct intel_cdclk_funcs i830_cdclk_funcs = {
*/
void intel_init_cdclk_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
- if (IS_METEORLAKE(dev_priv)) {
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14) {
dev_priv->display.funcs.cdclk = &mtl_cdclk_funcs;
dev_priv->display.cdclk.table = mtl_cdclk_table;
} else if (IS_DG2(dev_priv)) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
index 1b00ef2c6185..a42b3c4c0ed7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
bool intel_is_c10phy(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum phy phy)
{
- if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915) && (phy < PHY_C))
+ if (DISPLAY_VER_FULL(i915) == IP_VER(14, 0) && phy < PHY_C)
return true;
return false;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 43cba98f7753..85efd77f491b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ bool intel_phy_is_tc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy)
if (IS_DG2(dev_priv))
/* DG2's "TC1" output uses a SNPS PHY */
return false;
- else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || IS_METEORLAKE(dev_priv))
+ else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER_FULL(dev_priv) == IP_VER(14, 0))
return phy >= PHY_F && phy <= PHY_I;
else if (IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv))
return phy >= PHY_D && phy <= PHY_I;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
index 5f479f3828bb..1623c0c5e8a1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
@@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ void intel_dmc_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
INIT_WORK(&dmc->work, dmc_load_work_fn);
- if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915)) {
+ if (DISPLAY_VER_FULL(i915) == IP_VER(14, 0)) {
dmc->fw_path = MTL_DMC_PATH;
dmc->max_fw_size = XELPDP_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
} else if (IS_DG2(i915)) {
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-25 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-25 0:13 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/9] Reduce MTL-specific platform checks Matt Roper
2023-07-25 0:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/i915: Consolidate condition for Wa_22011802037 Matt Roper
2023-07-25 9:21 ` Andi Shyti
2023-07-25 15:13 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-25 0:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915/xelpmp: Don't assume workarounds extend to future platforms Matt Roper
2023-07-25 9:32 ` Andi Shyti
2023-07-25 0:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915/xelpg: Call Xe_LPG workaround functions based on IP version Matt Roper
2023-07-25 9:51 ` Andi Shyti
2023-07-25 12:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-25 15:35 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-25 15:52 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-25 16:02 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-25 0:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/i915: Eliminate IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP Matt Roper
2023-07-25 10:04 ` Andi Shyti
2023-07-25 15:45 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-25 12:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-07-25 15:55 ` Matt Roper
2023-08-01 7:57 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-25 0:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/i915: Eliminate IS_MTL_MEDIA_STEP Matt Roper
2023-07-25 0:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915: Eliminate IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP Matt Roper
2023-07-25 0:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/i915/mtl: Eliminate subplatforms Matt Roper
2023-07-25 0:13 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2023-07-27 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/i915/display: Eliminate IS_METEORLAKE checks Lucas De Marchi
2023-07-27 19:05 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-25 0:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/i915: Replace several IS_METEORLAKE with proper IP version checks Matt Roper
2023-07-25 10:10 ` Andi Shyti
2023-07-25 16:16 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-25 1:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Reduce MTL-specific platform checks (rev2) Patchwork
2023-07-25 1:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-07-25 1:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-07-25 9:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230725001312.1907319-19-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox