From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 06/29] drm/i915/gvt: Explicitly check that vGPU is attached before shadowing
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 18:35:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230729013535.1070024-7-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230729013535.1070024-1-seanjc@google.com>
Move the check that a vGPU is attacked from is_2MB_gtt_possible() all the
way up to shadow_ppgtt_mm() to avoid unnecessary work, and to make it more
obvious that a future cleanup of is_2MB_gtt_possible() isn't introducing a
bug.
is_2MB_gtt_possible() has only one caller, ppgtt_populate_shadow_entry(),
and all paths in ppgtt_populate_shadow_entry() eventually check for
attachment by way of intel_gvt_dma_map_guest_page().
And of the paths that lead to ppgtt_populate_shadow_entry(),
shadow_ppgtt_mm() is the only one that doesn't already check for
INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ACTIVE or INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ATTACHED.
workload_thread() <= pick_next_workload() => INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ACTIVE
|
-> dispatch_workload()
|
|-> prepare_workload()
|
-> intel_vgpu_sync_oos_pages()
| |
| |-> ppgtt_set_guest_page_sync()
| |
| |-> sync_oos_page()
| |
| |-> ppgtt_populate_shadow_entry()
|
|-> intel_vgpu_flush_post_shadow()
|
1: |-> ppgtt_handle_guest_write_page_table()
|
|-> ppgtt_handle_guest_entry_add()
|
2: | -> ppgtt_populate_spt_by_guest_entry()
| |
| |-> ppgtt_populate_spt()
| |
| |-> ppgtt_populate_shadow_entry()
| |
| |-> ppgtt_populate_spt_by_guest_entry() [see 2]
|
|-> ppgtt_populate_shadow_entry()
kvmgt_page_track_write() <= KVM callback => INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ATTACHED
|
|-> intel_vgpu_page_track_handler()
|
|-> ppgtt_write_protection_handler()
|
|-> ppgtt_handle_guest_write_page_table_bytes()
|
|-> ppgtt_handle_guest_write_page_table() [see 1]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
index 5426a27c1b71..2aed31b497c9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
@@ -1163,8 +1163,6 @@ static int is_2MB_gtt_possible(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
if (!HAS_PAGE_SIZES(vgpu->gvt->gt->i915, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_2M))
return 0;
- if (!test_bit(INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ATTACHED, vgpu->status))
- return -EINVAL;
pfn = gfn_to_pfn(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm, ops->get_pfn(entry));
if (is_error_noslot_pfn(pfn))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1277,6 +1275,9 @@ static int ppgtt_populate_shadow_entry(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
if (!pte_ops->test_present(ge))
return 0;
+ if (!test_bit(INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ATTACHED, vgpu->status))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
gfn = pte_ops->get_pfn(ge);
switch (ge->type) {
--
2.41.0.487.g6d72f3e995-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-29 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-29 1:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 00/29] drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 01/29] drm/i915/gvt: Verify pfn is "valid" before dereferencing "struct page" Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 11:21 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 02/29] drm/i915/gvt: remove interface intel_gvt_is_valid_gfn Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 03/29] drm/i915/gvt: Verify hugepages are contiguous in physical address space Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 1:47 ` Yan Zhao
2023-08-01 11:22 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 04/29] drm/i915/gvt: Don't try to unpin an empty page range Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 11:18 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 05/29] drm/i915/gvt: Put the page reference obtained by KVM's gfn_to_pfn() Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 11:25 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-07-29 1:35 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-08-01 1:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 06/29] drm/i915/gvt: Explicitly check that vGPU is attached before shadowing Yan Zhao
2023-08-01 23:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 23:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4.1] " Sean Christopherson
2023-08-02 1:22 ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 07/29] drm/i915/gvt: Error out on an attempt to shadowing an unknown GTT entry type Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 1:45 ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 08/29] drm/i915/gvt: Don't rely on KVM's gfn_to_pfn() to query possible 2M GTT Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 11:28 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 09/29] drm/i915/gvt: Use an "unsigned long" to iterate over memslot gfns Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 11:28 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 10/29] drm/i915/gvt: Drop unused helper intel_vgpu_reset_gtt() Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 11:30 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 11/29] drm/i915/gvt: Protect gfn hash table with vgpu_lock Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 11:32 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 12/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Move kvm_arch_flush_shadow_{all, memslot}() to mmu.c Sean Christopherson
2023-08-03 23:50 ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 13/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't rely on page-track mechanism to flush on memslot change Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 14/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't bounce through page-track mechanism for guest PTEs Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 15/29] KVM: drm/i915/gvt: Drop @vcpu from KVM's ->track_write() hook Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 11:35 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 16/29] KVM: x86: Reject memslot MOVE operations if KVMGT is attached Sean Christopherson
2023-08-30 15:04 ` Like Xu
2023-08-30 20:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-31 6:20 ` Like Xu
2023-08-31 16:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 17/29] drm/i915/gvt: Don't bother removing write-protection on to-be-deleted slot Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 11:37 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 18/29] KVM: x86: Add a new page-track hook to handle memslot deletion Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 19/29] drm/i915/gvt: switch from ->track_flush_slot() to ->track_remove_region() Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 11:39 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 20/29] KVM: x86: Remove the unused page-track hook track_flush_slot() Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 21/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Move KVM-only page-track declarations to internal header Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 22/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Use page-track notifiers iff there are external users Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 23/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop infrastructure for multiple page-track modes Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 24/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename page-track APIs to reflect the new reality Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 25/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Assert that correct locks are held for page write-tracking Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 26/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug the VM if write-tracking is used but not enabled Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 27/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop @slot param from exported/external page-track APIs Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 28/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle KVM bookkeeping in page-track APIs, not callers Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 29/29] drm/i915/gvt: Drop final dependencies on KVM internal details Sean Christopherson
2023-08-01 11:42 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-07-29 2:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups (rev9) Patchwork
2023-08-01 23:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups (rev10) Patchwork
2023-08-01 23:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-08-02 1:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-08-04 0:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 00/29] drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups Sean Christopherson
2023-09-01 1:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups (rev11) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230729013535.1070024-7-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yongwei.ma@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox