[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Run relevant bits of debugfs drop_caches per GT

[Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>]

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Walk all GTs when doing the respective bits of drop_caches work.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
---
Hi,

I'm proposing this new version of the series I sent here[*].
Patch 1 from that series is not necessary so taht I'm going to
propose the original version proposed by Tvrtko when we were
young.

Andi

Changelog
=========
v2 -> v3:
 - fix the "for_each_gt()" parameter order.
v1 -> v2:
 - drop the gt idling and the cache flushing decoupling and stick
   to the original version.

[*] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/123301/

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 7a90a2e32c9f1..e9b79c2c37d84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -740,15 +740,19 @@ static int
 i915_drop_caches_set(void *data, u64 val)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = data;
+	struct intel_gt *gt;
 	unsigned int flags;
+	unsigned int i;
 	int ret;
 
 	drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Dropping caches: 0x%08llx [0x%08llx]\n",
 		val, val & DROP_ALL);
 
-	ret = gt_drop_caches(to_gt(i915), val);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	for_each_gt(gt, i915, i) {
+		ret = gt_drop_caches(gt, val);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
 
 	fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
 	flags = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
-- 
2.40.1