public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [rft, PATCH v1 0/2] drm/i915/dsi: An attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO on VLV
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 08:10:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231018051052.1328852-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)

DSI code for VBT has a set of ugly GPIO hacks, one of which is direct
talking to GPIO IP behind the actual driver's back. An attempt to fix
that is here.

If I understood correctly, my approach should work in the similar way as
the current IOSF GPIO. 

Hans, I believe you have some devices that use this piece of code,
is it possible to give a test run on (one of) them?

Andy Shevchenko (2):
  drm/i915/dsi: Extract common soc_gpio_exec() helper
  drm/i915/dsi: Replace poking of VLV GPIOs behind the driver's back

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 150 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)

-- 
2.40.0.1.gaa8946217a0b


             reply	other threads:[~2023-10-18  5:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-18  5:10 Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-10-18  5:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 1/2] drm/i915/dsi: Extract common soc_gpio_exec() helper Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-18  5:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 2/2] drm/i915/dsi: Replace poking of VLV GPIOs behind the driver's back Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-18  9:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [rft, PATCH v1 0/2] drm/i915/dsi: An attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO on VLV Hans de Goede
2023-10-18 12:52   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-24 15:58     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-18 19:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2023-10-18 21:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231018051052.1328852-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox