From: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
To: Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Cc: DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Fix for potential false positives in GuC hang selftest
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:00:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231114010016.234570-2-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231114010016.234570-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Noticed that the hangcheck selftest is submitting a non-preemptoble
spinner. That means that even if the GuC does not die, the heartbeat
will still kick in and trigger a reset. Which is rather defeating the
purpose of the test - to verify that the heartbeat will kick in if the
GuC itself has died. The test is deliberately killing the GuC, so it
should never hit the case of a non-dead GuC. But it is not impossible
that the kill might fail at some future point due to other driver
re-work.
So, make the spinner pre-emptible. That way the heartbeat can get
through if the GuC is alive and context switching. Thus a reset only
happens if the GuC dies. Thus, if the kill should stop working the
test will now fail rather than claim to pass.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc_hangcheck.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc_hangcheck.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc_hangcheck.c
index 34b5d952e2bcb..26fdc392fce6c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc_hangcheck.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc_hangcheck.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static int intel_hang_guc(void *arg)
goto err;
}
- rq = igt_spinner_create_request(&spin, ce, MI_NOOP);
+ rq = igt_spinner_create_request(&spin, ce, MI_ARB_CHECK);
intel_context_put(ce);
if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(rq);
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-14 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-14 1:00 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/2] Selftest for FAST_REQUEST feature John.C.Harrison
2023-11-14 1:00 ` John.C.Harrison [this message]
2023-11-14 1:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/guc: Add a selftest for FAST_REQUEST errors John.C.Harrison
2023-11-29 21:22 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2023-11-14 2:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Selftest for FAST_REQUEST feature (rev2) Patchwork
2023-11-14 2:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-15 1:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Selftest for FAST_REQUEST feature (rev3) Patchwork
2023-11-15 2:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-11-16 22:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231114010016.234570-2-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
--to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox