From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/display: Cover all possible pipes in TP_printk()
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:49:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240918224927.GU5091@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240829220106.80449-5-gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 07:00:47PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> Tracepoints that display frame and scanline counters for all pipes were
> added with commit 1489bba82433 ("drm/i915: Add cxsr toggle tracepoint")
> and commit 0b2599a43ca9 ("drm/i915: Add pipe enable/disable
> tracepoints"). At that time, we only had pipes A, B and C. Now that we
> can also have pipe D, the TP_printk() calls are missing it.
>
> As a quick and dirty fix for that, let's define two common macros to be
> used for the format and values respectively, and also ensure we raise a
> build bug if more pipes are added to enum pipe.
>
> In the future, we should probably have a way of printing information for
> available pipes only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
I didn't did through the details of the tracepoint system, but I'm
assuming you checked that the underlying structure is zero-allocated so
that anything we don't specifically assign in TP_fast_assign will be 0
rather than uninitialized garbage? E.g., on an ICL platform with only
three pipes the pipe D output is guaranteed to be zero?
Assuming that's the case,
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h | 43 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h
> index 759b985c84a9..2ce66dffdfa5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,29 @@
> #define _TRACE_PIPE_A 0
> #define _TRACE_PIPE_B 1
> #define _TRACE_PIPE_C 2
> +#define _TRACE_PIPE_D 3
> +
> +/*
> + * FIXME: Several TP_printk() calls below display frame and scanline numbers for
> + * all possible pipes (regardless of whether they are available) and that is
> + * done with a constant format string. A better approach would be to generate
> + * that info dynamically based on available pipes, but, while we do not have
> + * that implemented yet, let's assert that the constant format string indeed
> + * covers all possible pipes.
> + */
> +static_assert(I915_MAX_PIPES - 1 == _TRACE_PIPE_D);
> +
> +#define _PIPES_FRAME_AND_SCANLINE_FMT \
> + "pipe A: frame=%u, scanline=%u" \
> + ", pipe B: frame=%u, scanline=%u" \
> + ", pipe C: frame=%u, scanline=%u" \
> + ", pipe D: frame=%u, scanline=%u"
> +
> +#define _PIPES_FRAME_AND_SCANLINE_VALUES \
> + __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_A], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_A] \
> + , __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_B], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_B] \
> + , __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_C], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_C] \
> + , __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_D], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_D]
>
> TRACE_EVENT(intel_pipe_enable,
> TP_PROTO(struct intel_crtc *crtc),
> @@ -52,11 +75,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(intel_pipe_enable,
> __entry->pipe_name = pipe_name(crtc->pipe);
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("dev %s, pipe %c enable, pipe A: frame=%u, scanline=%u, pipe B: frame=%u, scanline=%u, pipe C: frame=%u, scanline=%u",
> - __get_str(dev), __entry->pipe_name,
> - __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_A], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_A],
> - __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_B], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_B],
> - __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_C], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_C])
> + TP_printk("dev %s, pipe %c enable, " _PIPES_FRAME_AND_SCANLINE_FMT,
> + __get_str(dev), __entry->pipe_name, _PIPES_FRAME_AND_SCANLINE_VALUES)
> );
>
> TRACE_EVENT(intel_pipe_disable,
> @@ -81,11 +101,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(intel_pipe_disable,
> __entry->pipe_name = pipe_name(crtc->pipe);
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("dev %s, pipe %c disable, pipe A: frame=%u, scanline=%u, pipe B: frame=%u, scanline=%u, pipe C: frame=%u, scanline=%u",
> - __get_str(dev), __entry->pipe_name,
> - __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_A], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_A],
> - __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_B], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_B],
> - __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_C], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_C])
> + TP_printk("dev %s, pipe %c disable, " _PIPES_FRAME_AND_SCANLINE_FMT,
> + __get_str(dev), __entry->pipe_name, _PIPES_FRAME_AND_SCANLINE_VALUES)
> );
>
> TRACE_EVENT(intel_crtc_flip_done,
> @@ -211,11 +228,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(intel_memory_cxsr,
> __entry->new = new;
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("dev %s, cxsr %s->%s, pipe A: frame=%u, scanline=%u, pipe B: frame=%u, scanline=%u, pipe C: frame=%u, scanline=%u",
> + TP_printk("dev %s, cxsr %s->%s, " _PIPES_FRAME_AND_SCANLINE_FMT,
> __get_str(dev), str_on_off(__entry->old), str_on_off(__entry->new),
> - __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_A], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_A],
> - __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_B], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_B],
> - __entry->frame[_TRACE_PIPE_C], __entry->scanline[_TRACE_PIPE_C])
> + _PIPES_FRAME_AND_SCANLINE_VALUES)
> );
>
> TRACE_EVENT(g4x_wm,
> --
> 2.46.0
>
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-18 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-29 22:00 [PATCH 0/4] Miscelaneous fixes for display tracepoints Gustavo Sousa
2024-08-29 22:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/display: Fix out-of-bounds access in pipe-related tracepoints Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-18 22:13 ` Matt Roper
2024-08-29 22:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/display: Store pipe name in trace events Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-18 22:37 ` Matt Roper
2024-09-23 14:30 ` Gustavo Sousa
2024-08-29 22:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/display: Do not use ids from enum pipe in TP_printk() Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-18 22:41 ` Matt Roper
2024-08-29 22:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/display: Cover all possible pipes " Gustavo Sousa
2024-09-18 22:49 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2024-09-23 16:55 ` Gustavo Sousa
2024-08-30 0:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Miscelaneous fixes for display tracepoints Patchwork
2024-08-30 0:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-08-31 13:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240918224927.GU5091@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox