From: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, jani.nikula@intel.com,
ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, uma.shankar@intel.com,
animesh.manna@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v14 2/3] drm/i915/vrr: Split vrr-compute-config in two phases
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:35:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241010040503.1795399-3-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241010040503.1795399-1-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
From: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
As vrr guardband calculation is dependent on modified
vblank start so better to compute late after all
vblank adjustement.
v1: Initial version.
v2: Split in a separate patch from panel-replay workaround. [Ankit]
v3: Add a function for late vrr related computation. [Ville]
v4: Use flipline instead of vrr.enable and some cosmetic changes. [Ville]
v5: Use intel_vrr_possible helper.
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c | 13 +++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index e1f6255e918b..b1e3551c7594 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -5050,6 +5050,8 @@ intel_modeset_pipe_config_late(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
struct drm_connector *connector;
int i;
+ intel_vrr_compute_config_late(crtc_state);
+
for_each_new_connector_in_state(&state->base, connector,
conn_state, i) {
struct intel_encoder *encoder =
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
index f65ebe210047..496b6fa32c08 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
@@ -244,11 +244,16 @@ intel_vrr_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
(crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vtotal -
crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.vsync_end);
}
+}
+
+void intel_vrr_compute_config_late(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+ struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
+ struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
+
+ if (!intel_vrr_possible(crtc_state))
+ return;
- /*
- * For XE_LPD+, we use guardband and pipeline override
- * is deprecated.
- */
if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 13) {
crtc_state->vrr.guardband =
crtc_state->vrr.vmin + 1 - adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h
index af921dda4619..b3b45c675020 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ bool intel_vrr_possible(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
void intel_vrr_check_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
void intel_vrr_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
struct drm_connector_state *conn_state);
+void intel_vrr_compute_config_late(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
void intel_vrr_set_transcoder_timings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
void intel_vrr_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
void intel_vrr_send_push(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-10 4:05 [PATCH v14 0/3] Vrr refactoring and panel replay workaround Mitul Golani
2024-10-10 4:05 ` [PATCH v14 1/3] drm/i915/vrr: Add helper to check if vrr possible Mitul Golani
2024-10-10 4:05 ` Mitul Golani [this message]
2024-10-10 4:05 ` [PATCH v14 3/3] drm/i915/panelreplay: Panel replay workaround with VRR Mitul Golani
2024-10-10 4:47 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Vrr refactoring and panel replay workaround (rev5) Patchwork
2024-10-10 4:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-11 10:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-14 7:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-16 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 0/3] Vrr refactoring and panel replay workaround Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241010040503.1795399-3-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
--to=mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
--cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox