Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, uma.shankar@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add bits for link_n_exended for DISPLAY >= 14
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:40:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241010041045.2014069-2-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241010041045.2014069-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

LINK_N register has bits 31:24 for extended link N value used for
HDMI2.1 and for an alternate mode of operation of DP TG DDA
(Bspec:50488).

Add support for these extra bits.

v2: Drop extra link_n_ext member. (Jani)
v3: Avoid link_n_ext in set_m_n helper. (Jani)

Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h              |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index e1f6255e918b..2a7fa0013b44 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -2721,14 +2721,21 @@ void intel_set_m_n(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 		   i915_reg_t data_m_reg, i915_reg_t data_n_reg,
 		   i915_reg_t link_m_reg, i915_reg_t link_n_reg)
 {
+	u32 link_n = m_n->link_n;
+
 	intel_de_write(i915, data_m_reg, TU_SIZE(m_n->tu) | m_n->data_m);
 	intel_de_write(i915, data_n_reg, m_n->data_n);
 	intel_de_write(i915, link_m_reg, m_n->link_m);
+
+	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
+		link_n &= ~PIPE_LINK_N1_EXTENDED_MASK;
+	else
+		link_n &= DATA_LINK_M_N_MASK;
 	/*
 	 * On BDW+ writing LINK_N arms the double buffered update
 	 * of all the M/N registers, so it must be written last.
 	 */
-	intel_de_write(i915, link_n_reg, m_n->link_n);
+	intel_de_write(i915, link_n_reg, link_n);
 }
 
 bool intel_cpu_transcoder_has_m2_n2(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
@@ -3438,7 +3445,13 @@ void intel_get_m_n(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 		   i915_reg_t link_m_reg, i915_reg_t link_n_reg)
 {
 	m_n->link_m = intel_de_read(i915, link_m_reg) & DATA_LINK_M_N_MASK;
-	m_n->link_n = intel_de_read(i915, link_n_reg) & DATA_LINK_M_N_MASK;
+	m_n->link_n = intel_de_read(i915, link_n_reg);
+
+	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
+		m_n->link_n &= ~PIPE_LINK_N1_EXTENDED_MASK;
+	else
+		m_n->link_n &= DATA_LINK_M_N_MASK;
+
 	m_n->data_m = intel_de_read(i915, data_m_reg) & DATA_LINK_M_N_MASK;
 	m_n->data_n = intel_de_read(i915, data_n_reg) & DATA_LINK_M_N_MASK;
 	m_n->tu = REG_FIELD_GET(TU_SIZE_MASK, intel_de_read(i915, data_m_reg)) + 1;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 818142f5a10c..c605642ffc3e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -2167,6 +2167,8 @@
 
 #define _PIPEA_LINK_N1		0x60044
 #define _PIPEB_LINK_N1		0x61044
+#define  PIPE_LINK_N1_EXTENDED_MASK	REG_GENMASK(31, 24)
+#define  PIPE_LINK_N1_EXTENDED(val)	REG_FIELD_PREP(PIPE_LINK_N1_EXTENDED_MASK, (val))
 #define PIPE_LINK_N1(dev_priv, tran) _MMIO_TRANS2(dev_priv, tran, _PIPEA_LINK_N1)
 
 #define _PIPEA_LINK_M2		0x60048
-- 
2.45.2


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-10  4:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-10  4:10 [PATCH 0/4] Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-10  4:10 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2024-11-28  6:54   ` [PATCH 1/4] Add bits for link_n_exended for DISPLAY >= 14 Srikanth V, NagaVenkata
2024-10-10  4:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/display: Limit m/n ratio to 10 for display > 12 Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-10  4:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/display: Add bits for Wa_14021768792 for linkm/n ratio > 10 Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-10  4:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14021768792 for BMG DP for link_m/n " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-10  5:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit (rev3) Patchwork
2024-10-10  5:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-10-10  5:23 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-11 11:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-21 11:26 [PATCH 0/4] Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit Ankit Nautiyal
2025-03-21 11:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] Add bits for link_n_exended for DISPLAY >= 14 Ankit Nautiyal
2025-03-21 18:31   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-21 18:42     ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-26  9:24     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-17 17:41 [PATCH 0/4] Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-17 17:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] Add bits for link_n_exended for DISPLAY >= 14 Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-17 17:46   ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-18  3:58     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241010041045.2014069-2-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox