From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/xe/display: Add intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 04:48:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202411060402.TB3RmJ09-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241105121857.17389-2-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Hi Maarten,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-xe/drm-xe-next]
[also build test ERROR on next-20241105]
[cannot apply to linus/master drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-tip/drm-tip v6.12-rc6]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Maarten-Lankhorst/drm-xe-display-Add-intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait/20241105-202047
base: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel.git drm-xe-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241105121857.17389-2-maarten.lankhorst%40linux.intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/9] drm/xe/display: Add intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait
config: i386-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241106/202411060402.TB3RmJ09-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241106/202411060402.TB3RmJ09-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411060402.TB3RmJ09-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c:8:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:40:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h:16:
In file included from include/drm/drm_connector.h:32:
In file included from include/drm/drm_util.h:36:
In file included from include/linux/kgdb.h:19:
In file included from include/linux/kprobes.h:28:
In file included from include/linux/ftrace.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/kallsyms.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2213:
include/linux/vmstat.h:518:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
518 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c:17:38: error: a parameter list without types is only allowed in a function definition
17 | void intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait(plane);(struct intel_plane *plane)
| ^
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c:17:46: error: expected identifier or '('
17 | void intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait(plane);(struct intel_plane *plane)
| ^
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c:17:46: error: expected ')'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c:17:45: note: to match this '('
17 | void intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait(plane);(struct intel_plane *plane)
| ^
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c:448:4: error: call to undeclared function 'intel_initial_vblank_wait'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
448 | intel_initial_vblank_wait(crtc);
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c:448:4: note: did you mean 'intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait'?
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.h:11:6: note: 'intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait' declared here
11 | void intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait(struct intel_plane *plane);
| ^
1 warning and 4 errors generated.
vim +17 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
16
> 17 void intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait(plane);(struct intel_plane *plane)
18 {
19 struct intel_crtc *crtc = intel_crtc_for_pipe(to_intel_display(plane), plane->pipe);
20
21 intel_crtc_wait_for_next_vblank(crtc);
22 }
23
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-05 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-05 12:18 [PATCH 1/9] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-05 12:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/xe/display: Add intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-05 15:47 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-05 20:48 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-11-05 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/xe: Move suballocator init to after display init Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-05 12:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/xe: Defer irq init until after xe_display_init_noaccel Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-05 12:18 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-05 12:18 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/xe/sriov: Move VF bootstrap and query_config to vf_guc_init Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-05 12:18 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/xe: Simplify GuC early initialisation Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-05 12:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/xe: Make it possible to read instance0 MCR registers after xe_gt_mcr_init_early Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-05 12:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe: Split init of xe_gt_init_hwconfig to xe_gt_init and *_early Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-05 12:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-11-07 10:01 [PATCH 1/9] " Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/xe/display: Add intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait Maarten Lankhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202411060402.TB3RmJ09-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox