From: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [i915-rt v2 10/16] drm/i915: Use preempt_disable/enable_rt() where recommended
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 10:22:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251216092226.1777909-28-dev@lankhorst.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251216092226.1777909-18-dev@lankhorst.se>
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Mario Kleiner suggest in commit
ad3543ede630f ("drm/intel: Push get_scanout_position() timestamping into kms driver.")
a spots where preemption should be disabled on PREEMPT_RT. The
difference is that on PREEMPT_RT the intel_uncore::lock disables neither
preemption nor interrupts and so region remains preemptible.
The area covers only register reads and writes. The part that worries me
is:
- __intel_get_crtc_scanline() the worst case is 100us if no match is
found.
- intel_crtc_scanlines_since_frame_timestamp() not sure how long this
may take in the worst case.
It was in the RT queue for a while and nobody complained.
Disable preemption on PREEPMPT_RT during timestamping.
[bigeasy: patch description.]
Cc: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
index 772024f1c344e..75f334fe25aaa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
@@ -317,6 +317,20 @@ static void intel_vblank_section_exit(struct intel_display *display)
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
spin_unlock(&i915->uncore.lock);
}
+
+static void intel_vblank_section_enter_irqf(struct intel_display *display, unsigned long *flags)
+ __acquires(i915->uncore.lock)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&i915->uncore.lock, *flags);
+}
+
+static void intel_vblank_section_exit_irqf(struct intel_display *display, unsigned long flags)
+ __releases(i915->uncore.lock)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i915->uncore.lock, flags);
+}
#else
static void intel_vblank_section_enter(struct intel_display *display)
{
@@ -325,6 +339,17 @@ static void intel_vblank_section_enter(struct intel_display *display)
static void intel_vblank_section_exit(struct intel_display *display)
{
}
+
+static void intel_vblank_section_enter_irqf(struct intel_display *display, unsigned long *flags)
+{
+ *flags = 0;
+}
+
+static void intel_vblank_section_exit_irqf(struct intel_display *display, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ if (flags)
+ return;
+}
#endif
static bool i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_crtc *_crtc,
@@ -361,10 +386,10 @@ static bool i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_crtc *_crtc,
* timing critical raw register reads, potentially with
* preemption disabled, so the following code must not block.
*/
- local_irq_save(irqflags);
- intel_vblank_section_enter(display);
+ intel_vblank_section_enter_irqf(display, &irqflags);
- /* preempt_disable_rt() should go right here in PREEMPT_RT patchset. */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+ preempt_disable();
/* Get optional system timestamp before query. */
if (stime)
@@ -428,10 +453,10 @@ static bool i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_crtc *_crtc,
if (etime)
*etime = ktime_get();
- /* preempt_enable_rt() should go right here in PREEMPT_RT patchset. */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+ preempt_enable();
- intel_vblank_section_exit(display);
- local_irq_restore(irqflags);
+ intel_vblank_section_exit_irqf(display, irqflags);
/*
* While in vblank, position will be negative
@@ -469,13 +494,11 @@ int intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
unsigned long irqflags;
int position;
- local_irq_save(irqflags);
- intel_vblank_section_enter(display);
+ intel_vblank_section_enter_irqf(display, &irqflags);
position = __intel_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
- intel_vblank_section_exit(display);
- local_irq_restore(irqflags);
+ intel_vblank_section_exit_irqf(display, irqflags);
return position;
}
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-16 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-16 9:22 [i915-rt v2 00/16] drm/i915/display: All patches to make PREEMPT_RT work on i915 + xe Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 01/16] drm/i915/display: Fix intel_lpe_audio_irq_handler for PREEMPT-RT Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 02/16] drm/i915/display: Make get_vblank_counter use intel_de_read_fw() Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 03/16] drm/i915/display: Use intel_de_write_fw in intel_pipe_fastset Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 04/16] drm/i915/display: Make set_pipeconf use the fw variants Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 05/16] drm/i915/display: Move vblank put until after critical section Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 06/16] drm/i915/display: Remove locking from intel_vblank_evade " Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 20:15 ` [i915-rt v2.1] " Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-22 18:14 ` [i915-rt v2 06/16] " kernel test robot
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 07/16] drm/i915/display: Handle vlv dsi workaround in scanline_in_safe_range too Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 08/16] drm/i915/display: Make icl_dsi_frame_update use _fw too Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 09/16] drm/i915/display: Enable interrupts earlier on PREEMPT_RT Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 11/16] PREEMPT_RT injection Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 12/16] drm/i915/display: Use intel_de_read_fw in colorops Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 13/16] drm/i915/gt: Use spin_lock_irq() instead of local_irq_disable() + spin_lock() Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 14/16] drm/i915: Drop the irqs_disabled() check Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 15/16] drm/i915/guc: Consider also RCU depth in busy loop Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 9:22 ` [i915-rt v2 16/16] Revert "drm/i915: Depend on !PREEMPT_RT." Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-16 11:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/display: All patches to make PREEMPT_RT work on i915 + xe. (rev2) Patchwork
2025-12-16 20:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning for drm/i915/display: All patches to make PREEMPT_RT work on i915 + xe. (rev3) Patchwork
2025-12-16 20:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2025-12-16 21:27 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251216092226.1777909-28-dev@lankhorst.se \
--to=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox