From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Eslam Khafagy <eslam.medhat1993@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 13:21:01 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260105132101.28cb175c@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1321 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c
between commit:
0ddd3bb4b14c ("drm/pl111: Fix error handling in pl111_amba_probe")
from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit:
a1542b8ca6ed ("drm: pl111: replace dev_* print functions with drm_* variants")
from the drm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c
index d7dc83cf7b00,ac9e4b6bd2eb..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c
@@@ -294,8 -295,8 +295,8 @@@ static int pl111_amba_probe(struct amba
ret = devm_request_irq(dev, amba_dev->irq[0], pl111_irq, 0,
variant->name, priv);
if (ret != 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "%s failed irq %d\n", __func__, ret);
+ drm_err(drm, "%s failed irq %d\n", __func__, ret);
- return ret;
+ goto dev_put;
}
ret = pl111_modeset_init(drm);
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2026-01-05 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-05 2:21 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-08-20 1:21 linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-08-20 10:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-08-20 21:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-18 4:41 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-18 6:27 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2025-01-14 1:30 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-26 3:06 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-29 10:11 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-26 2:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-08 0:47 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-13 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
2017-01-17 0:59 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260105132101.28cb175c@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eslam.medhat1993@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linmq006@gmail.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox